The Bengals are on the decline

[yellowxdiscipline]

Bengals are on the decline, still. Hey at least Flacco is still eli......oh wait nevermind.

[Beaker]

(09-24-2017, 09:10 PM)E.A. Poe Wrote: 0-3 trumps any smack you can muster.

Not really. Losing 44-7 to the Jags is pretty bad.

[cinci4life]

(09-24-2017, 08:42 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: He threw 4 picks and lost a fumble?

Lol, nope, he didn't.


0-3

He also threw for 170 yards compared to the measly 28 Flacco threw yesterday. Flacco also managed to have a worse QBR 0.5. So yes he actually was worse.

[coltsfan4ever]

(09-25-2017, 04:58 PM)Beaker Wrote: Not really. Losing 44-7 to the Jags is pretty bad.

As a fan of one of the teams in the AFC South, I have to agree with this statement. Getting crapped on by the Jags for 44 points is pretty bad. 

[BmorePat87]

(09-25-2017, 10:41 PM)cinci4life Wrote: He also threw for 170 yards compared to the measly 28 Flacco threw yesterday. Flacco also managed to have a worse QBR 0.5. So yes he actually was worse.

lol, the sad existence of 0-3... trying to say 150 yards makes up for turning the ball over 3 times. 

[cinci4life]

(09-26-2017, 08:18 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: lol, the sad existence of 0-3... trying to say 150 yards makes up for turning the ball over 3 times. 

What's sad is you still trying to convince yourself that Flacco couldn't possibly have a worse game than Dalton even with the facts in front of you. Flacco got his ass owned and it kills you inside. You can say what you want but facts are facts.

[BmorePat87]

(09-26-2017, 07:19 PM)cinci4life Wrote: What's sad is you still trying to convince yourself that Flacco couldn't possibly have a worse game than Dalton even with the facts in front of you. Flacco got his ass owned and it kills you inside. You can say what you want but facts are facts.

Does the fact that the Ravens caused Dalton to be so awful make you irrationally angry? 

[Aquapod770]

(09-26-2017, 09:56 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Does the fact that the Ravens caused Dalton to be so awful make you irrationally angry? 

I mean you should know right? The Bengals have caused Flacco to look so awful for a long time. Although a lot of teams can do that, so I guess it's not a huge achievement. 

[BmorePat87]

(09-27-2017, 12:24 PM)Aquapod770 Wrote: I mean you should know right? The Bengals have caused Flacco to look so awful for a long time. Although a lot of teams can do that, so I guess it's not a huge achievement. 

The Bengals make Joe look mediocre. I don't know if they've ever made him look 5 turnovers bad. 

[Aquapod770]

(09-27-2017, 12:34 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: The Bengals make Joe look mediocre. I don't know if they've ever made him look 5 turnovers bad. 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201009190cin.htm

Joe threw 4 picks in 2010 against the horrible TO-chocinco team. 

Inb4: "it's not 5!!!!!!"

[BmorePat87]

(09-27-2017, 04:33 PM)Aquapod770 Wrote: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201009190cin.htm

Joe threw 4 picks in 2010 against the horrible TO-chocinco team. 

Inb4: "it's not 5!!!!!!"

I don't have to say anything. You already said enough.

[ballsofsteel]

This is bad news. The Bengals are turning into the Browns. At one time the Nfl was looking into eliminating teams in Cincinnati and Cleveland and give Columbus A team. Now the NFL is looking into giving London a team. Being cinci and cleveland are basically the same city so whatever city has the worse record could be the one to go. The Bengals better
get their shit together. Thank you!

[E.A. Poe]

Meh. Nothing is worse than 0-3...except 0-4.

Win a game before offering smack.

[*rfaulk34*]

How many other clueless dumbasses in here think you need to win before throwing some smack on someone?

Anyone?

Bueller? Bueller?

Yeah, i didn't think so. 

Learn the ***** room before opening your stupid mouth.

[Aquapod770]

(09-28-2017, 04:51 AM)E.A. Poe Wrote: Meh. Nothing is worse than 0-3...except 0-4.

Win a game before offering smack.

But if the Bengals win and the Ravens lose you won't be here to accept the smack? 

[Aquapod770]

(09-27-2017, 12:34 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: The Bengals make Joe look mediocre. I don't know if they've ever made him look 5 turnovers bad. 

(09-27-2017, 04:33 PM)Aquapod770 Wrote: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201009190cin.htm

Joe threw 4 picks in 2010 against the horrible TO-chocinco team. 

Inb4: "it's not 5!!!!!!"

(09-27-2017, 04:48 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I don't have to say anything. You already said enough.

Didn't realize "ever" only meant within the past 4 weeks. 

[BmorePat87]

(09-28-2017, 12:27 PM)Aquapod770 Wrote: Didn't realize "ever" only meant within the past 4 weeks. 

Well, you did admit they never made him look 5 turnover bad... but I wasn't going to play the game you thought I was (4 isn't 5).


For someone claiming they always make him look bad, you had to go back 7 years for an example. 

[E.A. Poe]

(09-28-2017, 11:35 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: How many other clueless dumbasses in here think you need to win before throwing some smack on someone?

Anyone?

Bueller? Bueller?

Yeah, i didn't think so. 

Learn the ***** room before opening your stupid mouth.

Ask the moderators. They're the one's who came up with the notion of no smacking if you haven't won a game.(see post #27) You probably shouldn't call them dumbasses.

Btw, are you excited about the Toiletbowl game in Ohio this weekend? We're going to find out which turd floats and which sinks to the bottom. Good times either way!

[ballsofsteel]

In my humble opinion wins or losses shouldn't matter when talking smack. A lot of the Bengal fans on here are very good at talking smack even though their teams organization has pretty much stunk for 25 years. Next to the die hard stain fans they are some of the most loyal fans in the nfl. My hat is off to them.

[BmorePat87]

The great thing about rock bottom is the only place you can go is up.

Good job Bengals.


On a side note, I'm officially off the Flacco train