Posts: 39,634
Threads: 1,718
Reputation:
56927
Joined: May 2015
Location: SW PA
Posts: 4,398
Threads: 7
Reputation:
15503
Joined: Jun 2015
And had it been a play action, it would've been a low hit on a QB dropping back to pass and Suggs was hitting him low regardless.
What a scum bag.
Our father, who art in Hell
Unhallowed, be thy name
Cursed be thy sons and daughters
Of our nemesis who are to blame
Thy kingdom come, Nema
Posts: 39,634
Threads: 1,718
Reputation:
56927
Joined: May 2015
Location: SW PA
Posts: 26,189
Threads: 656
Reputation:
247485
Joined: May 2015
Location: Jackson, OH
Dirty birds, for shame..
Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations
-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Posts: 790
Threads: 18
Reputation:
2235
Joined: May 2015
Location: 4th and 1 at the goal
It's preseason (and in some cases, pre-job training) for the officials too. All officials need a reminder of how to handle the option play (ie, the QB is a runner and not protected by passer rules).
Posts: 13,245
Threads: 431
Reputation:
39559
Joined: May 2015
Location: Birdland
Quote:"That's something they're probably coached to do and something he's told to do on the read-option," Kelce said. "It's not particularly dirty for him to hit the quarterback. I just thought it was just a little weird that he went right at the knee area. I don't think, looking back on it, that it was anything malicious. I think he's just playing the game."
I'm glad part of your post was the Eagles player saying it wasn't a dirty hit.
Posts: 603
Threads: 3
Reputation:
1888
Joined: May 2015
I'd take him on my team, for sure.
Posts: 10,867
Threads: 1,344
Reputation:
39973
Joined: May 2015
Location: Robbing Grandmas Of The Covid Vaccine In Northern Kentucky-Greater Cincinnati
(08-23-2015, 11:42 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I'm glad part of your post was the Eagles player saying it wasn't a dirty hit.
Then he looks like a crybaby.
When a questionable hit occurs, a lot of players say that it wasn't a dirty hit or that there was no ill intentions just so they don't look like babies or so they don't start drama.
Posts: 7,208
Threads: 51
Reputation:
49684
Joined: May 2015
(08-23-2015, 11:42 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I'm glad part of your post was the Eagles player saying it wasn't a dirty hit.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/08/23/eagles-think-dirty-terrell-suggs-tried-to-hurt-sam-bradford/
Actually, several Eagles players have said it was dirty.
Posts: 7,208
Threads: 51
Reputation:
49684
Joined: May 2015
(08-23-2015, 11:16 AM)Bmoreblitz Wrote: It's preseason (and in some cases, pre-job training) for the officials too. All officials need a reminder of how to handle the option play (ie, the QB is a runner and not protected by passer rules).
They botched the name of the call, as it should have been unnecessary roughness instead of roughing the passer, but it was a penalty regardless.
Posts: 790
Threads: 18
Reputation:
2235
Joined: May 2015
Location: 4th and 1 at the goal
(08-23-2015, 02:15 PM)Whatever Wrote: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/08/23/eagles-think-dirty-terrell-suggs-tried-to-hurt-sam-bradford/
Actually, several Eagles players have said it was dirty.
Shocker there
Posts: 790
Threads: 18
Reputation:
2235
Joined: May 2015
Location: 4th and 1 at the goal
(08-23-2015, 02:18 PM)Whatever Wrote: They botched the name of the call, as it should have been unnecessary roughness instead of roughing the passer, but it was a penalty regardless.
Lol....they didn't mess up the name of the call.
There is no way to call that unnecessary roughness. Lol how? It wasn't a late hit or was it an illegal hit.
Roughing the passer would've been closer (which they called) if the refs felt it wasn't a read option.
It's a gray area. Suggs didn't have to go in low. Didn't look to be malicious.
Posts: 28,828
Threads: 40
Reputation:
127990
Joined: May 2015
Location: Parts Unknown, PA
I watched that and the Eagles fans were holding their collective breath EVERY time Bradford got touched, but that looks extra bad in photo-form.
Posts: 19,721
Threads: 144
Reputation:
163037
Joined: May 2015
Location: Covington, Ky
Looked like he went to the side and tried to wrap him around his thighs. He could have tried to go straight through his legs but he went at an angle. It's not Suggs fault that Bradford has bad knees. Would Eagles fans prefer that he goes up around his shoulders and risk a concussion?
I've never found it that hard to go right at a guys waist, but whatever.
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
Posts: 4,829
Threads: 107
Reputation:
22659
Joined: May 2015
Location: An undisclosed biological research facility
(08-23-2015, 03:12 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: I've never found it that hard to go right at a guys waist, but whatever.
And you never even played football.
Posts: 1,821
Threads: 19
Reputation:
7217
Joined: May 2015
(08-23-2015, 01:49 PM)BFritz21 Wrote:
Then he looks like a crybaby.
When a questionable hit occurs, a lot of players say that it wasn't a dirty hit or that there was no ill intentions just so they don't look like babies or so they don't start drama.
That sounds like a technicality. Therefore, your point is invalid.
Posts: 13,245
Threads: 431
Reputation:
39559
Joined: May 2015
Location: Birdland
(08-23-2015, 03:12 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Looked like he went to the side and tried to wrap him around his thighs. He could have tried to go straight through his legs but he went at an angle. It's not Suggs fault that Bradford has bad knees. Would Eagles fans prefer that he goes up around his shoulders and risk a concussion?
I've never found it that hard to go right at a guys waist, but whatever.
Because I am a Ravens fan, I didn't want to be the one who explained that when people launch themselves to tackle other players, sometimes they hit a different area because the other guy is still moving.
Considering the goal of his position, it's likely Suggs wanted to wrap him up in a place near the knees so it's easier to pull him down, but not actually hit his knees and get a 15 yard penalty.
But, hey, it's football. People get hit.
(08-23-2015, 01:49 PM)BFritz21 Wrote:
Then he looks like a crybaby.
When a questionable hit occurs, a lot of players say that it wasn't a dirty hit or that there was no ill intentions just so they don't look like babies or so they don't start drama.
and they don't want people to not take them seriously. I get it!
(08-23-2015, 02:15 PM)Whatever Wrote: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/08/23/eagles-think-dirty-terrell-suggs-tried-to-hurt-sam-bradford/
Actually, several Eagles players have said it was dirty.
Thanks. I was wondering why the OP would supply a link where the opposing team said it wasn't dirty, but now I see two people thought it was. Oh well, as your link says, the hit was legal and the penalty was incorrect.
Posts: 790
Threads: 18
Reputation:
2235
Joined: May 2015
Location: 4th and 1 at the goal
(08-23-2015, 03:12 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: I've never found it that hard to go right at a guys waist,
Posts: 38,906
Threads: 921
Reputation:
132452
Joined: May 2015
Suggs knew exactly what he was doing.
Posts: 4,398
Threads: 7
Reputation:
15503
Joined: Jun 2015
(08-23-2015, 02:47 PM)Bmoreblitz Wrote: Lol....they didn't mess up the name of the call.
There is no way to call that unnecessary roughness. Lol how? It wasn't a late hit or was it an illegal hit.
Roughing the passer would've been closer (which they called) if the refs felt it wasn't a read option.
It's a gray area. Suggs didn't have to go in low. Didn't look to be malicious.
It didn't look to be malicious? Tackling a player with a history of knee injuries low despite the fact that the ball was 5 yards up field isn't malicious?
No wonder Ray Lewis is a hero in Baltimore - your definition of malicious is all ****** up.
Our father, who art in Hell
Unhallowed, be thy name
Cursed be thy sons and daughters
Of our nemesis who are to blame
Thy kingdom come, Nema
|