Driskel should be backup QB

[Millhouse]

(08-20-2018, 11:59 AM)bengalfan74 Wrote: Agree,

I'd love to get Bridgewater if he becomes available but I highly doubt that's gonna happen. Driskel shows promise, that's about all you can ask for in a backup. It's very rare to have a Joe Montana waiting in the wings.

For me Driskell has shown a stronger arm with more mobility than Barkley. Barkley has a noodle arm it seems, but even worse is that he doesn't make up for that with accuracy.

Until I see Driskell against starters though, I don't have anything else to say about him. As of now though, he should be the #2 two instead of Barkley. And I dont see the Bengals at this point bringing in anyone else, so the job should be his.

[*psychdoctor*]

(08-20-2018, 01:22 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Driskel over Barkley

Matt Moore over Driskel.

I think that kid from the Bears, Bray or whatever his name, is better than all listed above.   

[Millhouse]

(08-20-2018, 01:22 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Driskel over Barkley

Matt Moore over Driskel.

Throwing wise Id take Moore. But he has the mobility of Marvin.