11-25-2018, 07:30 PM
While I understand everyone's frustration and Andy is always the scapegoat, we need to think more logically and less emotionally. While not a top tier QB, Dalton is good. If he is able to play, you have to start him. Benching him for Driskel hurts potential trade value.
I'm not opposed to moving on from Dalton. I'm not opposed to letting Driskel run the show until we find the QB of the future. However, you negatively impact your potential return by benching Dalton for Driskel. If the team decided they wanted to part ways with Andy and tried to trade him, the other team(s) can always use that in negotiations. "You benched him for a back up" does not help boost value.
I understand that Andy can be cut with little cap implications, but he's a good QB who is under control for 2 more seasons on an affordable contract. There is value in that. We could get something in return as opposed to just cutting him and moving on. So starting Driskel the rest of the way if Dalton is able to play is not in the best interest of the team.
I'm not opposed to moving on from Dalton. I'm not opposed to letting Driskel run the show until we find the QB of the future. However, you negatively impact your potential return by benching Dalton for Driskel. If the team decided they wanted to part ways with Andy and tried to trade him, the other team(s) can always use that in negotiations. "You benched him for a back up" does not help boost value.
I understand that Andy can be cut with little cap implications, but he's a good QB who is under control for 2 more seasons on an affordable contract. There is value in that. We could get something in return as opposed to just cutting him and moving on. So starting Driskel the rest of the way if Dalton is able to play is not in the best interest of the team.