Posts: 13,473
Threads: 504
Joined: May 2015
Location: South Florida
(09-27-2015, 11:53 PM)McC Wrote: Wouldn't that make them the Oranges?
No BG has the same colors as the Browns. They just use brown to accent.
Well places accents in uniforms can make it or break it. Why they should let Nike go nuts.
Posts: 355
Threads: 8
Joined: Oct 2015
(09-28-2015, 12:38 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: No BG has the same colors as the Browns. They just use brown to accent.
Well places accents in uniforms can make it or break it. Why they should let Nike go nuts.
The Browns uni's will change soon enough. There's no way they're keeping that.
That said, I think the Bengals helmet is great but they need to back to 90s uni's with subtle Bengal stripes and the Bengal on the Sleeve.
Posts: 355
Threads: 8
Joined: Oct 2015
Brown is close enough to black anyway.
You ever wonder why the division is basically all black ...except for the dark brown.
Posts: 230
Threads: 12
Reputation:
269
Joined: Aug 2015
Browns' uniforms make them look like a college team.
Posts: 13,473
Threads: 504
Joined: May 2015
Location: South Florida
(10-12-2015, 05:26 PM)Benton Wrote: But BG isn't the Browns, it's the Falcons.
The Browns aren't named after a bird. Or the color. But how many people would get confused if the Browns showed up in uniforms that weren't brown?
Making brown an accent color is still showing up with brown on. And mascot names have nothing to do with this, orange, brown, and white are hard colors to make look sweet. That's why you minimize brown. Ever wonder why the Browns always wore white even at home all those years .... Because brown is an awful color.
It's maddening they wanted to keep the colors, history, and name in Cleveland. Should have let them go to Baltimore and started new.