Posts: 5,584
Threads: 62
Reputation:
24969
Joined: May 2015
Also, non-calls. And 31 teams voted in favor of this. Only the Bengals did not.
I don't know if that's a good thing or not, though the Saints-Rams game makes for a strong argument. I also wonder why the Bengals of all teams broke the unity on that one.
Posts: 19,085
Threads: 235
Reputation:
177311
Joined: May 2015
(03-26-2019, 10:29 PM)hollodero Wrote: Also, non-calls. And 31 teams voted in favor of this. Only the Bengals did not.
I also wonder why the Bengals of all teams broke the unity on that one.
Dre K.
Posts: 5,240
Threads: 60
Reputation:
39414
Joined: Mar 2018
Location: Oklahoma
(03-26-2019, 10:53 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: Dre K.
This got a good laugh out of me. Props.
Posts: 5,584
Threads: 62
Reputation:
24969
Joined: May 2015
(03-26-2019, 10:53 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: Dre K.
Yeah that was an initial impulse of mine as well.
@topic, I still am unsure how to feel about making judgment calls reviewable. I guess this new rule will lead to many discussions after the fact.
Posts: 1,289
Threads: 22
Reputation:
7245
Joined: Jan 2019
TBH I'm not sure I like this idea. I think it's mostly a knee-jerk reaction that in the long run will do more harm to the watchability of games than good.
...and it's not like a coach can challenge any of these in the final two minutes of a half anyways.
Posts: 1,289
Threads: 22
Reputation:
7245
Joined: Jan 2019
Why they won't agree to guarantee every team at least one possession in overtime, I will never understand.
Posts: 8,754
Threads: 219
Reputation:
29701
Joined: May 2015
Location: Fredericksburg Virginia
Every questionable PI will go in favor of the offense; also PI is like holding you can call it on every contested catch. There is going to be a ton of ticky tack PIs this year.
Posts: 11,960
Threads: 103
Reputation:
81482
Joined: May 2015
(03-26-2019, 11:20 PM)Jakeypoo Wrote: Every questionable PI will go in favor of the offense; also PI is like holding you can call it on every contested catch. There is going to be a ton of ticky tack PIs this year.
It's gonna be a nightmare.
Posts: 14,996
Threads: 121
Reputation:
47888
Joined: May 2015
Location: Hyborea
Actually I suspect it will result in some of the more egregious PI calls being overturned.
Posts: 19,552
Threads: 629
Reputation:
83981
Joined: Oct 2016
I wonder why the Bengals were the ONLY TEAM to vote against this?
Posts: 8,754
Threads: 219
Reputation:
29701
Joined: May 2015
Location: Fredericksburg Virginia
(03-27-2019, 12:01 AM)THE PISTONS Wrote: I wonder why the Bengals were the ONLY TEAM to vote against this?
Mike hates is replay
Posts: 13,428
Threads: 132
Reputation:
89022
Joined: May 2015
(03-27-2019, 12:01 AM)THE PISTONS Wrote: I wonder why the Bengals were the ONLY TEAM to vote against this?
Mike Brown often votes against giving refs more control over football games. This new rule gives replay officials more power to pick and choose PIs.
Posts: 5,606
Threads: 197
Reputation:
14886
Joined: May 2015
On one hand I hate it, but then after seeing the blatant PI in the Saints/Rams Champioship game.....it's needed. That was a Championship game......should have had the best of the best refs. Heck it was 3 penalties in one, or at least 2 easy penaltys to call. They just need less bs rules and better refs but that won't happen.
This is the NFL scrambling to stop the bleeding. Goodwill has ruined this game. I love this sport but it would not surprise me one bit if I out live it. Hell im 45, smoke and eating chocolate ice cream straight from the carton as I type this.
Posts: 8,207
Threads: 97
Reputation:
22044
Joined: Nov 2015
(03-27-2019, 12:34 AM)TKUHL Wrote: On one hand I hate it, but then after seeing the blatant PI in the Saints/Rams Champioship game.....it's needed. That was a Championship game......should have had the best of the best refs. Heck it was 3 penalties in one, or at least 2 easy penaltys to call. They just need less bs rules and better refs but that won't happen.
This is the NFL scrambling to stop the bleeding. Goodwill has ruined this game. I love this sport but it would not surprise me one bit if I out live it. Hell im 45, smoke and eating chocolate ice cream straight from the carton as I type this.
I think they do have quality Refs, we don;t realize the real speed of a play because most of us are seeing it isolated on TV and not on the field, even in the stands we still don;t get the real picture of being on the field.. and even with replay we still can;t always determine the call.
I am not a big fan of replay especially such judgement calls as interference but at least the coaches still only have two flags on replay.. thank god
Posts: 3,699
Threads: 23
Reputation:
17434
Joined: May 2015
Eh, it's worth trying out. Let's see how much impact it ultimately has on the length of games.
Everything in this post is my fault.
Posts: 764
Threads: 42
Reputation:
4470
Joined: Aug 2017
(03-27-2019, 07:15 AM)Essex Johnson Wrote: I think they do have quality Refs, we don;t realize the real speed of a play because most of us are seeing it isolated on TV and not on the field, even in the stands we still don;t get the real picture of being on the field.. and even with replay we still can;t always determine the call.
I am not a big fan of replay especially such judgement calls as interference but at least the coaches still only have two flags on replay.. thank god
I disagree with the quality refs part. I've been saying for years the refs in the NFL are too old. I mean the average age has to be 60+ years old. The speed of the game is too much. There needs to be a push to get younger officials on the field. That certainly won't make every call right, but I think it would help.
Posts: 6,177
Threads: 330
Reputation:
45699
Joined: May 2015
Location: is everything.
(03-26-2019, 11:56 PM)Joelist Wrote: Actually I suspect it will result in some of the more egregious PI calls being overturned.
I had to look this word up.
As for the new rule, it is going to make games longer as I suspect almost every closely defended pass play will end up being reviewed.
Posts: 5,584
Threads: 62
Reputation:
24969
Joined: May 2015
(03-27-2019, 07:44 AM)Tiger Teeth Wrote: I had to look this word up.
As for the new rule, it is going to make games longer as I suspect almost every closely defended pass play will end up being reviewed.
The number of challenges will stay the same though and booth reviews will only take place in the last minutes, like now. So there's hardly the potential to review every second play.
Posts: 2,083
Threads: 21
Reputation:
3855
Joined: Jul 2015
Everyone forgets instant reply was started to get “it” right. The pretext was eliminate controversies around getting the call wrong. Fast forward to a decade later and nothing has changed. I believe there is more controversies. Also one aspect why the officiating is so poor is I believe the officials are to reliant on reply and they get complacent. I believe instant reply has ruined all sports. I hate it in football as well as baseball. It is a momentum killer and it is hard to sit through listening to the pundits bloviate about nothing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posts: 11,614
Threads: 131
Reputation:
59060
Joined: May 2015
Offensive PI would be review able as well...like the pick play against by the Steelers that lost us the game.
In general I like the move as coaches still only have a limited number of challenges so if they use them up on tough to overturn judgment calls then they will suffer consequences later. I think when guys get hit with bad PI that result in 50 yard penalties knowing that can be corrected is a game changer.
|