***Official 2019 NFL Draft Discussion Thread***

[*psychdoctor*]

(04-26-2019, 09:02 PM)Kingslayer Wrote: Any LB worth taking this round?

IMO, no.  

[Sweetness]

(04-26-2019, 09:04 PM)Jakeypoo Wrote: Fans are so annoying yes you trade back and get more picks. That's what Seattle and New England  do all the time.

They have Russell Wilson and Tom Brady. 

[Sled21]

(04-26-2019, 09:04 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Man...there is no doubt the Bengals are 100% committed to Andy Dalton. They've had chances to draft Haskins and Lock.

Taylor wants to win now, not 2 years from now when he might not be here... besides, we're going to stick with Dalton, then get the hippie from Clemson when he comes out....

[RunKijanaRun]

(04-26-2019, 09:04 PM)Jakeypoo Wrote: Fans are so annoying yes you trade back and get more picks. That's what Seattle and New England do all the time.

Oh, that’s all it takes??

All these wasted years.

FOH.

[cinci4life]

I'd be surprised if it wasn't Irv Smith.

[*pally*]

Draft trade chart math says Bengals came up slightly short in pick worth.

Broncos get 480 points
Bengals get 445 points

— Paul Dehner Jr. (@pauldehnerjr) April 26, 2019

[Gamma Ray Tan]

(04-26-2019, 09:07 PM)t3r3e3 Wrote: Seems a bit light on the haul.

I would have demanded at least a 3rd

[sandwedge]

(04-26-2019, 09:03 PM)Joelist Wrote: Mack Wilson has a second round grade. 

Since we dropped down to 20 pick of rd2, that puts Wilson on the table

[THE PISTONS]

(04-26-2019, 09:07 PM)Sled21 Wrote: Taylor wants to win now, not 2 years from now when he might not be here... besides, we're going to stick with Dalton, then get the hippie from Clemson when he comes out....

Well, you need a good infrastructure for any QB to win...and that's offensive line. Building your line is ALWAYS a good investment as long as the guys pan out.

[t3r3e3]

(04-26-2019, 09:06 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: Depends where you look. Some places have him in the 3rd.

He tested rather poorly given his initial perception of an athletic LB. He also graded out rather poorly on coverage. I’d rather have Cashman or Burr-Kirven in the 3rd.

The Pats V Rams trade showed that the Bengals coulda done better on the trade down.

[cinci4life]

Joejuan Williams

[t3r3e3]

(04-26-2019, 09:08 PM)Gamma Ray Tan Wrote: I would have demanded at least a 3rd

Pats just gave up a 2 and 3 to move up 11 spots. Would have rather had another 3 than a 4 and 6.

[Kingslayer]

Corner hmm

[yellowxdiscipline]

sorry but theres no way we can roster 13 picks

[masonbengals fan]

(04-26-2019, 09:08 PM)sandwedge Wrote: Since we dropped down to 20 pick of rd2, that puts Wilson on the table

I think so too.

[Bengalitis]

(04-26-2019, 09:04 PM)Jakeypoo Wrote: Fans are so annoying yes you trade back and get more picks. That's what Seattle and New England  do all the time.

wow, you just compared us to Seattle and New England!! 

[*psychdoctor*]

Smith, Jr. TE is still there.

[Goalpost]

You would think with Denver getting a QB we could have fleeced them more.

[THE PISTONS]

(04-26-2019, 09:11 PM)yellowxdiscipline Wrote: sorry but theres no way we can roster 13 picks

That side of it is tough, but out of 13 picks...you'd have to think we'd land 2-3 really good players.

[*bfine32*]

For the folks bytching about the trade back: Who would you have taken in the original spot?