Mason Foster release

[SadFaceBengal15]

(07-23-2019, 04:50 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Members who frequent the draft forum may remember I loved Mason coming out of college. But dude is now 30. We have an equally good MIKE who is 4 years younger. I think folks are going to be pleasantly surprised seeing a healthy Preston brown play. And have high hopes for Vigil and a couple of the youngsters

the drop off from brown to everyone else on our depth chart is massive.  so why not bring in someone who is equally as good as brown??  im confused.  Vigil is garbage and u all who still for some far fetched reason have hope for him will see why hes trash after this season.  evans is soft as a muffin i have hope for jefferson but until he wakes up(to put it politely) we have nobody behind brown other than pratt who i do think will be a solid pro atleast.  SIgn foster that simple.

[yellowxdiscipline]

Vigil is meh, Brown is meh, Pratt is an unknown... Cant hurt to bring in another guy at this point.

[SadFaceBengal15]

(07-25-2019, 12:05 PM)yellowxdiscipline Wrote: Vigil is meh, Brown is meh, Pratt is an unknown... Cant hurt to bring in another guy at this point.

this^^^^  and hes being polite.

[*ochocincos*]

Wish the Bengals would have gotten a guy more like Mark Barron in the offseason, as he is more of a coverage guy, but Foster would help solidify the position too. I'd be ok with both Foster and Brown as early down or run stuffing specialists who come off the field in passing situations. Vigil, Evans, and Jefferson aren't quite as suited to defend the run as Foster would be.