Sewell vs Chase. The better player is Chase. Both are a need but OL is the higher priority. If I’m making the decision I select Chase. I go OL in Rd. 2 even attempting to trade back up in RD 1 to grab a offensive tackle.
My logic is this. After watching Sewell play against Auburn where I didn’t think he performed well in a step up in competition versus how Chase performed in the best league in college I have to take chase.
(04-05-2021, 03:02 PM)Waite Hoyt Wrote: Sewell vs Chase. The better player is Chase. Both are a need but OL is the higher priority. If I’m making the decision I select Chase. I go OL in Rd. 2 even attempting to trade back up in RD 1 to grab a offensive tackle.
My logic is this. After watching Sewell play against Auburn where I didn’t think he performed well in a step up in competition versus how Chase performed in the best league in college I have to take chase.
(04-05-2021, 03:02 PM)Waite Hoyt Wrote: Sewell vs Chase. The better player is Chase. Both are a need but OL is the higher priority. If I’m making the decision I select Chase. I go OL in Rd. 2 even attempting to trade back up in RD 1 to grab a offensive tackle.
My logic is this. After watching Sewell play against Auburn where I didn’t think he performed well in a step up in competition versus how Chase performed in the best league in college I have to take chase.
(04-05-2021, 03:02 PM)Waite Hoyt Wrote: Sewell vs Chase. The better player is Chase. Both are a need but OL is the higher priority. If I’m making the decision I select Chase. I go OL in Rd. 2 even attempting to trade back up in RD 1 to grab a offensive tackle.
My logic is this. After watching Sewell play against Auburn where I didn’t think he performed well in a step up in competition versus how Chase performed in the best league in college I have to take chase.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.