WELCOME Cameron Sample, DE, Tulane

[kevin]

Ist of 3 picks in round 4.

ESPN says plays with a high motor. CBS SPORTS says great Leverage, Nice Pass Rush Moves

So far 2 Offense, 2 Defense

[NATI BENGALS]

He kicked ass at the senior bowl and had a lot of instant wins over some big names. Senior Bowl defensive MVP too. I’m a fan.

[tBengal]

Saw the last name Sample and cringed. Sounds like a solid player though.

[Sanforbd]

We hate drafting o line men

[*ochocincos*]

(05-01-2021, 01:40 PM)Sanforbd Wrote: We hate drafting o line men

What if the Bengals are actually satisfied with their OL and just wanted to get one upgrade at OG?
I don't agree with it, but it's possible they feel that way.

[kevin]

(05-01-2021, 01:40 PM)Sanforbd Wrote: We hate drafting o line men

2 more Picks in round 4. 

[Nicomo Cosca]

One big winner this pre-draft process has been @GreenWaveFB versatile DL Cam Sample. Won consistently during Senior Bowl 1-on-1’s with great cross-face quickness. Most teams had @cameron_sample graded in 4th/5th rounds back in the fall but now feel he won’t make it out of Day 2. pic.twitter.com/IsAv0uCaNW

— Jim Nagy (@JimNagy_SB) April 15, 2021

[*SHRacerX*]

(05-01-2021, 01:40 PM)tBengal Wrote: Saw the last name Sample and cringed. Sounds like a solid player though.

We have two Samples.  Must save on Jersey lettering somehow...

[Sanforbd]

(05-01-2021, 01:41 PM)ochocincos Wrote: What if the Bengals are actually satisfied with their OL and just wanted to get one upgrade at OG?
I don't agree with it, but it's possible they feel that way.

It’s obvious they feel that way

[sandwedge]

(05-01-2021, 01:40 PM)Sanforbd Wrote: We hate drafting o line men

I don't think I've seen any OT go off the board today. Could still be in play @139.  C. Sample is a beast and love this pick!

[fredtoast]

(05-01-2021, 01:40 PM)Sanforbd Wrote: We hate drafting o line men

Is that why in our last 4 drafts we have used 2 firsts and a second on O-linemen?

[fredtoast]

(05-01-2021, 01:41 PM)ochocincos Wrote: What if the Bengals are actually satisfied with their OL and just wanted to get one upgrade at OG?
I don't agree with it, but it's possible they feel that way.

They may not be 100% satisfied, but at this point in the draft there is more value in going BPA.

Why reach for a guy who already has a fourth/fifth round grade?

[Murdock2420]

(05-01-2021, 01:41 PM)ochocincos Wrote: What if the Bengals are actually satisfied with their OL and just wanted to get one upgrade at OG?
I don't agree with it, but it's possible they feel that way.

Posted a tweet in the draft thread that said exactly that.

After the Carman pick

Zac Taylor said he likes the state of the Bengals offensive line right now. #Bengals

— Tyler Dragon (@TheTylerDragon) May 1, 2021

 

[Sanforbd]

(05-01-2021, 02:22 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Is that why in our last 4 drafts we have used 2 firsts and a second on O-linemen?

Five spots on the line. Picks that busted are irrelevant.

[fredtoast]

(05-01-2021, 02:32 PM)Sanforbd Wrote:  Picks that busted are irrelevant.

Because that means they were never drafted?

[fredtoast]

(05-01-2021, 02:25 PM)Murdock2420 Wrote: Posted a tweet in the draft thread that said exactly that.

After the Carman pick

Zac Taylor said he likes the state of the Bengals offensive line right now. #Bengals

— Tyler Dragon (@TheTylerDragon) May 1, 2021

 

Unfortunately I think that is a re-tweet from the second day of the draft last year.

[Murdock2420]

(05-01-2021, 02:36 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Unfortunately I think that is a re-tweet from the second day of the draft last year.

Has to be a high level of concern if we leave the draft with only 1 OL.

At least, I would hope it is a high level of concern.

[Sanforbd]

(05-01-2021, 02:36 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Unfortunately I think that is a re-tweet from the second day of the draft last year.

Bottom 10 o line guaranteed

[Sanforbd]

(05-01-2021, 02:34 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Because that means they were never drafted?

Because we still need to replace them obviously.

If we drafted 3 bust qbs 3 years in a row we’d still need a qb right? Your logic would have them still rolling out some corpse. But good try homer.

[fredtoast]

(05-01-2021, 02:41 PM)Sanforbd Wrote: Because we still need to replace them obviously.

If we drafted 3 bust qbs 3 years in a row we’d still need a qb right? Your logic would have them still rolling out some corpse. But good try homer.

My logic says nothing like that.

Your logic says that if we draft QB three years in a row that means we hate drafting QBs.

BTW this year we have used two picks in the first four rounds on O-line.