Posts: 40,628
Threads: 1,062
Joined: May 2015
-Going into free agency I predicted that we would sign at least one mid-tier WR with some proven production in the NFL. Top level WRs get a lot of money, but there are always decent veterans available for a reasonable price.
-Going into the draft I predicted that we would select multiple WRs with at least one in the top 3 rounds.
-In Bengals offense the #3 WR is basically a starter and we often run 4 WR sets.
So I still see a big hole in our offense at the #4 WR position. Are there any decent free agents still out there? Are there any likely to be released post draft? I wouldn't count on an UDFA to contribute this year, but are there any decent ones out there we could sign for depth?
Posts: 348
Threads: 5
Reputation:
968
Joined: Sep 2015
Do we still not have Auden Tate?
Posts: 27,856
Threads: 349
Reputation:
238104
Joined: Aug 2016
Not grabbing at least one more WR in this draft was my only minor complaint. I guess I’d feel ok with Tate as #4, but when we inevitably lose Chase to the 1st round injury curse that bumps Tate up to being a starter. Which would be...not ideal.
Posts: 40,628
Threads: 1,062
Joined: May 2015
(05-02-2021, 10:39 AM)Spider Wrote: Do we still not have Auden Tate?
You mean the guy who was often not even on the active roster on gamedays because he was behind Erickson and Mike Thomas?
Yes. He is still around. And we also re-signed Thomas who I assume would currently be listed as our #4 WR.
But I don't have much confidence in either of those guys.
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
Open competition between Tate and Thomas, but Thomas does more work on teams. One thing the Bengals didn't address was KR/PR so I look for them to sign a UDFA WR with that skill set.
Posts: 2,823
Threads: 20
Reputation:
19192
Joined: Nov 2017
Auden Tate or Mike Thomas at the moment, but I expect to see another solid vet brought in after June 1st cuts, so its up in the air right now.
Posts: 2,980
Threads: 50
Reputation:
10556
Joined: May 2015
Location: Anderson, SC
I predict we’ll add a veteran once they start trimming down rosters getting closer to the season. I did think Mike Thomas flashed a little last year though.
Posts: 5,240
Threads: 60
Reputation:
39414
Joined: Mar 2018
Location: Oklahoma
Unfortunately, it is probably Thomas. And that is disgusting. I would vote for Marqise Lee out of the remaining FAs.
Posts: 40,628
Threads: 1,062
Joined: May 2015
(05-02-2021, 10:48 AM)CarolinaBengalFanGuy Wrote: I did think Mike Thomas flashed a little last year though.
Flashing a little would have been okay if he was just a rookie, but last year was his fifth year in the league. He has 23 receptions for his entire career.
Posts: 38,541
Threads: 910
Reputation:
130140
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 40,628
Threads: 1,062
Joined: May 2015
(05-02-2021, 11:19 AM)bfine32 Wrote:
Who is this?
Why post a picture with no name?
Posts: 38,541
Threads: 910
Reputation:
130140
Joined: May 2015
(05-02-2021, 11:21 AM)fredtoast Wrote: 1. Who is this?
2. Why post a picture with no name?
1. Riley Lees
2. Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish, feed him for a lifetime..
Posts: 18,619
Threads: 462
Reputation:
118131
Joined: May 2015
Location: Nashville, TN
(05-02-2021, 10:50 AM)KillerGoose Wrote: Unfortunately, it is probably Thomas. And that is disgusting. I would vote for Marqise Lee out of the remaining FAs.
I’ve always liked Lee. I could also be game for Dede Westbrook or Damiere Byrd. Probably Westbrook since he’s 6’ and only 28 years old.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.
Sorry for Party Rocking!
Posts: 2,475
Threads: 27
Reputation:
19325
Joined: May 2015
Our new udfa receiver. Doesn't exactly inspire. Looks ready for the undertaker
Posts: 1,013
Threads: 35
Reputation:
9268
Joined: Apr 2021
I doubt there even needs to be official designations, even if there will be. Tate and Thomas are the combined #4/5, with the difference depending upon play call more than "who's better".
Posts: 445
Threads: 1
Reputation:
1073
Joined: Sep 2018
Location: Living Room Couch, Georgia
I agree with Fred. After Boyd and Higgins, who are still here, there wasn't a wide receiver on the team with more than 14 receptions for the season. Bengals 4 - 7 wide receivers who are left here were not very productive. That includes Mike Thomas and Auden Tate.
Posts: 6,119
Threads: 431
Reputation:
44170
Joined: May 2015
Joe Mixon unfortunately.
The boys are just talkin' ball, babyyyy
Posts: 3,123
Threads: 75
Reputation:
19535
Joined: Feb 2017
If we’re looking for experience I think golden Tate is still available.
College free agent wise I don’t know if josh imorhtebbe signed yet. Athletic specimen
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posts: 2,275
Threads: 15
Reputation:
9185
Joined: Apr 2017
It was a gripe of mine too. I think we needed a late round receiver to be the #4 and tgey failed to select one. I think that’s going to be a minor issue moving forward unless it gets addressed by a cut player or that Riley Lee guy.
Posts: 1,288
Threads: 4
Reputation:
12274
Joined: Nov 2015
Location: Florida
(05-02-2021, 11:24 AM)bfine32 Wrote: 1. Riley Lees
2. Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish, feed him for a lifetime..
Build a man a fire and he's warm for a night. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
2
|