Posts: 1,013
Threads: 35
Reputation:
9268
Joined: Apr 2021
https://www.packerforum.com/threads/official-bengals-thread.84255/
https://packers.timesfour.com/topic/it-s-bengals-week
https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/38535-week-5-leadup-packers-improved-bengals/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=161&t=2126801
The vast Packers fanbase braces for a visit to the jungle. The early consensus seems to be a predictable one: the Bengals are a 3-1 team to be respected who can present challenges, especially to the Packers defense, but the Packers should find a way to get out with a win. I don't think that's an unreasonable view for Green Bay fans to have. These are teams that play each other only every four years whose games week to week usually have minimal impact upon one another's fortunes. They pay little attention to us as we do to them (though perhaps we pay more just by virtue of their prime time presence).
Where I think they truly underestimate their opponent is with the Bengals' defense. That's been a recurring theme early in the season. A few of them have taken notice and are especially concerned about how their banged up offensive line is going to deal with Hendrickson, Hubbard, and company. We seem to be catching the Packers at a good time in general considering the injuries they're dealing with, especially as we get healthy out of our extended week.
One thing about the Packers fanbase is that they don't really have to "travel" to be prominently represented in the stands on the road. They're everywhere. It'll be up to the Cincinnati fans in attendance to minimize their relevance.
4
Posts: 877
Threads: 42
Reputation:
7552
Joined: May 2015
Found this gem on the first thread from "Cincinnati Smeagol."
Hi guys! Long-time Bengals fan here. Not here to start problems. You will be the first good (playoff caliber) team the Bengals will play this year. Just curious how we are seen in another (unbiased/non-AFC North) team's eyes. The way I see it is a close game would be our best chance. Rodgers is a mega-stud, no doubt there. I just hope the Bengals would show up and give you a competitive game, win or lose. I'm really excited about this game!
So which one of us is "Cincinnati Smeagol?" Tell the truth!
Posts: 14,281
Threads: 294
Reputation:
31560
Joined: May 2015
Bengals have beaten Rogers before. They can do it again. That is all.. 
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
Posts: 9,020
Threads: 51
Reputation:
47363
Joined: May 2015
Location: Top floor of the Better Business Burrow
(10-04-2021, 06:52 PM)Speedy Thomas Wrote: So which one of us is "Cincinnati Smeagol?" Tell the truth!
Can't help ya, I'm Cincinnati Smegma
Posts: 6,387
Threads: 110
Reputation:
14374
Joined: Jan 2020
(10-04-2021, 06:14 PM)JaggedJimmyJay Wrote: https://www.packerforum.com/threads/official-bengals-thread.84255/
https://packers.timesfour.com/topic/it-s-bengals-week
https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/38535-week-5-leadup-packers-improved-bengals/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=161&t=2126801
The vast Packers fanbase braces for a visit to the jungle. The early consensus seems to be a predictable one: the Bengals are a 3-1 team to be respected who can present challenges, especially to the Packers defense, but the Packers should find a way to get out with a win. I don't think that's an unreasonable view for Green Bay fans to have. These are teams that play each other only every four years whose games week to week usually have minimal impact upon one another's fortunes. They pay little attention to us as we do to them (though perhaps we pay more just by virtue of their prime time presence).
Where I think they truly underestimate their opponent is with the Bengals' defense. That's been a recurring theme early in the season. A few of them have taken notice and are especially concerned about how their banged up offensive line is going to deal with Hendrickson, Hubbard, and company. We seem to be catching the Packers at a good time in general considering the injuries they're dealing with, especially as we get healthy out of our extended week.
One thing about the Packers fanbase is that they don't really have to "travel" to be prominently represented in the stands on the road. They're everywhere. It'll be up to the Cincinnati fans in attendance to minimize their relevance.
Thanks for doing this bro. I'VE always enjoyed going to the opponents boards.. Esp after we win lol.. They usually start out saying we will kill the Bungals and by the end they are saying, " I can't believe the Bungals beat us. The season is over." Lol, good stuff...
1
Posts: 877
Threads: 42
Reputation:
7552
Joined: May 2015
(10-04-2021, 06:57 PM)Awful Llama Wrote: Can't help ya, I'm Cincinnati Smegma
Posts: 9,020
Threads: 51
Reputation:
47363
Joined: May 2015
Location: Top floor of the Better Business Burrow
(10-04-2021, 07:04 PM)Speedy Thomas Wrote:
Imagine how I feel 
Posts: 6,387
Threads: 110
Reputation:
14374
Joined: Jan 2020
I think smeagol was a poster on the original jungle noise on the main page years ago. Not sure if he made his way here ever though...
Posts: 20,257
Threads: 161
Reputation:
55572
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cincinnati
If I’m a Green Bay fan I say all the politic stuff and then predict a win. They are probably right. For the most part the Bengals are a 1:00 regional game, and they probably don’t know a ton about the Bengals outside of knowing Burrow is here.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
1
Posts: 16,713
Threads: 417
Reputation:
95685
Joined: May 2015
(10-04-2021, 06:55 PM)grampahol Wrote: Bengals have beaten Rogers before. They can do it again. That is all..
I believe the Bengals are 2-1 against Rogers...
1
Posts: 16,396
Threads: 151
Reputation:
61561
Joined: May 2015
(10-04-2021, 06:14 PM)JaggedJimmyJay Wrote: https://www.packerforum.com/threads/official-bengals-thread.84255/
https://packers.timesfour.com/topic/it-s-bengals-week
https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/38535-week-5-leadup-packers-improved-bengals/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=161&t=2126801
The vast Packers fanbase braces for a visit to the jungle. The early consensus seems to be a predictable one: the Bengals are a 3-1 team to be respected who can present challenges, especially to the Packers defense, but the Packers should find a way to get out with a win. I don't think that's an unreasonable view for Green Bay fans to have. These are teams that play each other only every four years whose games week to week usually have minimal impact upon one another's fortunes. They pay little attention to us as we do to them (though perhaps we pay more just by virtue of their prime time presence).
Where I think they truly underestimate their opponent is with the Bengals' defense. That's been a recurring theme early in the season. A few of them have taken notice and are especially concerned about how their banged up offensive line is going to deal with Hendrickson, Hubbard, and company. We seem to be catching the Packers at a good time in general considering the injuries they're dealing with, especially as we get healthy out of our extended week.
One thing about the Packers fanbase is that they don't really have to "travel" to be prominently represented in the stands on the road. They're everywhere. It'll be up to the Cincinnati fans in attendance to minimize their relevance.
When you have a premier QB you expect a chance to win at least
Posts: 13,628
Threads: 365
Reputation:
45805
Joined: May 2015
The only real question is who is going to run out on the field the last drive to distract Rodgers during his final game winning drive, causing their loss?
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
Quote:"Success doesn’t mean every single move they make is good" ~ Anonymous
"Let not the dumb have to educate" ~ jj22
1
Posts: 1,764
Threads: 155
Reputation:
10407
Joined: May 2015
(10-05-2021, 10:33 AM)jj22 Wrote: The only real question is who is going to run out on the field the last drive to distract Rodgers during his final game winning drive, causing their loss?
I remember that game from 2005
1
Posts: 5,548
Threads: 199
Reputation:
25210
Joined: May 2015
Location: Boise, ID
(10-04-2021, 06:52 PM)Speedy Thomas Wrote: Found this gem on the first thread from "Cincinnati Smeagol."
Hi guys! Long-time Bengals fan here. Not here to start problems. You will be the first good (playoff caliber) team the Bengals will play this year. Just curious how we are seen in another (unbiased/non-AFC North) team's eyes. The way I see it is a close game would be our best chance. Rodgers is a mega-stud, no doubt there. I just hope the Bengals would show up and give you a competitive game, win or lose. I'm really excited about this game!
So which one of us is "Cincinnati Smeagol?" Tell the truth!
I bet it’s packerbacker lol. He lives a tricky double agent lifestyle.
Posts: 1,764
Threads: 155
Reputation:
10407
Joined: May 2015
(10-05-2021, 10:43 AM)GreenCornBengal Wrote: I bet it’s packerbacker lol. He lives a tricky double agent lifestyle.
Hey GC how you doing buddy? I got a good laugh from your description of me lol.
Posts: 12,194
Threads: 214
Reputation:
56574
Joined: May 2015
Location: Lancaster, PA
(10-04-2021, 06:52 PM)Speedy Thomas Wrote: Found this gem on the first thread from "Cincinnati Smeagol."
Hi guys! Long-time Bengals fan here. Not here to start problems. You will be the first good (playoff caliber) team the Bengals will play this year. Just curious how we are seen in another (unbiased/non-AFC North) team's eyes. The way I see it is a close game would be our best chance. Rodgers is a mega-stud, no doubt there. I just hope the Bengals would show up and give you a competitive game, win or lose. I'm really excited about this game!
So which one of us is "Cincinnati Smeagol?" Tell the truth!
Eff whoever Smeagol is. What are the responses?
|
![[Image: giphy.gif]](http://media1.giphy.com/media/9EmYYw6o9cmsM/giphy.gif)
