Posts: 1,495
Threads: 69
Reputation:
4430
Joined: May 2015
Location: Eaton OH
If we can get an OL in the mid to top of 2nd round and we think they will fall to that level, I have no issue with trading down. When drafting you have to trust your own 'value' board.
To each his own... unless you belong to a political party...
Posts: 38,424
Threads: 908
Reputation:
129481
Joined: May 2015
I could see Houston being a viable trade partner. Both they and Detroit could use a QB. They pick 2 and 3 in RD 1 and that's too early for a QB in this draft (damn we sucked at exactly the right time), but Detroit also picks 32 due to trade with Rams. I could see Houston offering up their 2nd (37) a little extra (perhaps swap of 3rd rounders) to leap frog Detroit and get a QB that comes with a 5th year option.
Posts: 8,740
Threads: 219
Reputation:
29548
Joined: May 2015
Location: Fredericksburg Virginia
I have the Bengals trading down twice in a mock I'm working on.
Once with Detroit like BFine mentioned and again with the Colts for another third RD pick
I think it's important for the Bengals to keep getting cheap assets in the draft to help the team
Posts: 306
Threads: 7
Reputation:
1327
Joined: Dec 2017
I could see the Bengals trading down if they are targeting Zion Johnson. If a team is looking to trade up for a player, particularly a QB, to get the extra year, it may pay off. Less likely, I can also see the Bengals using next year's pick and moving way up to target a player. Where will we be picking next year anyway?