Posts: 7,766
Threads: 216
Reputation:
40801
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cave
Raiders may take a Bengal scout...that could leave them with only 5 scouts or so....
Posts: 11,614
Threads: 131
Reputation:
59032
Joined: May 2015
Not sure how integral he is in our operation, but he is African American so he’d net us multiple 3rds if they did hire him.
1
1
Posts: 14,614
Threads: 2,112
Reputation:
82482
Joined: May 2015
(01-18-2022, 08:11 PM)Au165 Wrote: Not sure how integral he is in our operation, but he is African American so he’d net us multiple 3rds if they did hire him.
https://www.bengals.com/news/trey-brown-brings-a-football-life-to-bengals-player-personnel
Winning makes believers of us all
Posts: 2,801
Threads: 39
Reputation:
5678
Joined: May 2015
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Formerly known as Judge on the Bengals.com message board.
1
Posts: 4,282
Threads: 35
Reputation:
26126
Joined: May 2015
Location: Columbus, Ohio
(01-18-2022, 08:11 PM)Au165 Wrote: Not sure how integral he is in our operation, but he is African American so he’d net us multiple 3rds if they did hire him.
He already interviewed with them before they hired Mayock so I’d say there’s a decent chance. Would the comp picks start in this draft so or 2023?
Man if we got 2 4ths for losing players and a 3rd this year for losing him that’d really open up the draft for us. Plus $70+ mil in FA if we cut Waynes….big time offseason coming after we win the SB
Posts: 7,766
Threads: 216
Reputation:
40801
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cave
He sounds like a good scout, but the Bengals need to expand the entire office anyways
Posts: 667
Threads: 8
Reputation:
2783
Joined: Apr 2021
(01-18-2022, 08:06 PM)psychdoctor Wrote: Raiders may take a Bengal scout...that could leave them with only 5 scouts or so....
Wait….what? This is a real rule? 1. I didn’t know losing scouts or coaches nets draft picks. 2. Because of his skin color it nets more? That’s crazy.
Posts: 20,257
Threads: 161
Reputation:
55572
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Jesus we have like three guys and someone wants to poach one? Dallas probably has like 50. Get one of theirs.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
Posts: 4,282
Threads: 35
Reputation:
26126
Joined: May 2015
Location: Columbus, Ohio
(01-18-2022, 09:11 PM)Ell Prez Wrote: Wait….what? This is a real rule? 1. I didn’t know losing scouts or coaches nets draft picks. 2. Because of his skin color it nets more? That’s crazy.
It was an update to the Rooney rule to encourage teams to hire and develop minority candidates. If you have a guy for 2+ years and then they get hired as a HC/GM for another team you get 2 3rd rounders for developing him.
Posts: 38,522
Threads: 909
Reputation:
129948
Joined: May 2015
(01-18-2022, 09:21 PM)leonardfan40 Wrote: It was an update to the Rooney rule to encourage teams to hire and develop minority candidates. If you have a guy for 2+ years and then they get hired as a HC/GM for another team you get 2 3rd rounders for developing him.
While good in principle I can see this having the opposite affect. Say we're interested in a Raven's staff member of color and he and a white guy from the NFC are rated pretty much equally in our evaluation. Which one are we taking?
Posts: 16,866
Threads: 70
Reputation:
58889
Joined: May 2015
Location: Richmond, VA
(01-18-2022, 09:48 PM)bfine32 Wrote: While good in principle I can see this having the opposite affect. Say we're interested in a Raven's staff member of color and he and a white guy from the NFC are rated pretty much equally in our evaluation. Which one are we taking?
Whichever one accepts our offer.
Posts: 13,428
Threads: 132
Reputation:
89022
Joined: May 2015
(01-18-2022, 09:48 PM)bfine32 Wrote: While good in principle I can see this having the opposite affect. Say we're interested in a Raven's staff member of color and he and a white guy from the NFC are rated pretty much equally in our evaluation. Which one are we taking?
There are around 8 HC opportunities right? If all hire minorities then that is 16 extra 3rd round picks. Then are you going to fill your OC/DC a White Guy or a Minority to have a chance at those 2 extra 3rd round picks?
I get they are trying to get more Minorities in front of the Camera but this screws deserving candidates out of jobs and can mess up the draft.
Posts: 10,740
Threads: 1,322
Reputation:
39486
Joined: May 2015
Location: Robbing Grandmas Of The Covid Vaccine In Northern Kentucky-Greater Cincinnati
(01-18-2022, 09:48 PM)bfine32 Wrote: While good in principle I can see this having the opposite affect. Say we're interested in a Raven's staff member of color and he and a white guy from the NFC are rated pretty much equally in our evaluation. Which one are we taking?
But are the draft picks taken from the team hiring the coach or are they added on like compensation picks to the end of the round?
While teams might still might not want to strengthen another team, it does make a big difference than if the hiring team is losing the picks.
Posts: 11,467
Threads: 19
Reputation:
78800
Joined: May 2015
Location: Where Mr. Kotter was before returning
Hope this isn't the scout that noticed Ja'Marr Chase and Joe Burrow are good.
I'm gonna break every record they've got. I'm tellin' you right now. I don't know how I'm gonna do it, but it's goin' to get done.
- Ja'Marr Chase
April 2021
Posts: 10,740
Threads: 1,322
Reputation:
39486
Joined: May 2015
Location: Robbing Grandmas Of The Covid Vaccine In Northern Kentucky-Greater Cincinnati
(01-18-2022, 10:07 PM)jason Wrote: Hope this isn't the scout that noticed Ja'Marr Chase and Joe Burrow are good.
Posts: 11,614
Threads: 131
Reputation:
59032
Joined: May 2015
(01-18-2022, 10:01 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: But are the draft picks taken from the team hiring the coach or are they added on like compensation picks to the end of the round?
While teams might still might not want to strengthen another team, it does make a big difference than if the hiring team is losing the picks.
They are like compensatory picks.
Posts: 5,612
Threads: 18
Reputation:
19982
Joined: Apr 2020
(01-18-2022, 09:48 PM)bfine32 Wrote: While good in principle I can see this having the opposite affect. Say we're interested in a Raven's staff member of color and he and a white guy from the NFC are rated pretty much equally in our evaluation. Which one are we taking?
The team making the hire does not lose picks, you get that, right?
I think having the best GM/HC possible might be more important than if you pick #110th or #112th in round 4.
If someone else hires him, you'd lose out on your candidate AND still pick later.
Posts: 5,612
Threads: 18
Reputation:
19982
Joined: Apr 2020
(01-18-2022, 10:07 PM)jason Wrote: Hope this isn't the scout that noticed Ja'Marr Chase and Joe Burrow are good.
I hope it isn't the scout that noticed Ossai, Logan Wilson, and Chris Evans were good.
Posts: 4,282
Threads: 35
Reputation:
26126
Joined: May 2015
Location: Columbus, Ohio
(01-18-2022, 10:01 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: But are the draft picks taken from the team hiring the coach or are they added on like compensation picks to the end of the round?
While teams might still might not want to strengthen another team, it does make a big difference than if the hiring team is losing the picks.
They are comp picks. Teams hiring don’t lose picks as that would discourage them from hiring minority candidates. This is just to encourage teams to give minority coaches lower roles to help develop more quality candidates for HC/GM jobs when they become available.
Overall I don’t see many teams passing up on stealing a quality coach/FO exec because a rival will get a couple of late 3rd round picks. In bfine’s scenario we’d be hurting them by taking a talent from their organization but giving they get a couple of comp picks to make up for it. Seems like a push at best. When you look at the success rates of 3rd round comp picks it would probably still work out in the hiring teams favor to steal a known commodity from their franchise.
Posts: 13,428
Threads: 132
Reputation:
89022
Joined: May 2015
(01-18-2022, 10:26 PM)leonardfan40 Wrote: They are comp picks. Teams hiring don’t lose picks as that would discourage them from hiring minority candidates. This is just to encourage teams to give minority coaches lower roles to help develop more quality candidates for HC/GM jobs when they become available.
Overall I don’t see many teams passing up on stealing a quality coach/FO exec because a rival will get a couple of late 3rd round picks. In bfine’s scenario we’d be hurting them by taking a talent from their organization but giving they get a couple of comp picks to make up for it. Seems like a push at best. When you look at the success rates of 3rd round comp picks it would probably still work out in the hiring teams favor to steal a known commodity from their franchise.
There are a limited number of Comp picks and draft picks all together. Other teams will lose opportunities for comp picks and others will get theirs pushed down.
|