Posts: 13,612
Threads: 133
Reputation:
91221
Joined: May 2015
(12-28-2022, 11:22 AM)NUGDUKWE Wrote: I think Burrow is great and he's certainly the most important piece of this team. I also think he will keep us relevant so in that sense our window is going to be open. But without a solid defense is he just outscoring the likes of Mahommes and Allen? I think what really worries me is I think secondaries are one of the toughest units to get right. I think Bates and Bell make a really good safety unit which helps our defense greatly and I fear that this may be the last year we see both of them on the field together.
Also on a side note. Reader is a beast and what Burrow does for offense he may do for the defense. Goodberry had some clips of him on his show this week and his play on that fumble against the Patriots was in insane. I know Bell knocked the ball out and Hill recovered but that play revolved around him.
I've heard alot about forward progress on that play but the refs were right to not blow the whistle. DJ Reader was pushing the RB backwards but did so with only his shoulder he never got his hands on the ball carrier so there is no tackle happening lol.
Posts: 3,623
Threads: 20
Reputation:
11396
Joined: Apr 2021
(12-28-2022, 11:30 AM)Synric Wrote: I've heard alot about forward progress on that play but the refs were right to not blow the whistle. DJ Reader was pushing the RB backwards but did so with only his shoulder he never got his hands on the ball carrier so there is no tackle happening lol.
I mean watching the play in Slow motion I could see the argument for blowing the whistle. But watching it in real time I thought he may bounce out of it the way the play looked. I'm sure they were about to blow the whistle but they've been letting plays go all year all across the league so it must be a point on emphasis to not blow plays dead to early.
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
(12-27-2022, 04:58 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Could be correct, I do think maybe using a pump fake might help at times to negate some of the batted balls.
While I agree with this in theory, I don't think he really has time most snaps.
Posts: 20,880
Threads: 99
Reputation:
194557
Joined: May 2015
Location: Bluegrass Region
(12-28-2022, 11:42 AM)NUGDUKWE Wrote: I mean watching the play in Slow motion I could see the argument for blowing the whistle. But watching it in real time I thought he may bounce out of it the way the play looked. I'm sure they were about to blow the whistle but they've been letting plays go all year all across the league so it must be a point on emphasis to not blow plays dead to early.
True, and how pissed would we have been if they blew Perine dead a couple of weeks ago?
"Better send those refunds..."
Posts: 5,747
Threads: 18
Reputation:
20871
Joined: Apr 2020
(12-26-2022, 05:31 PM)Forever Spinning Vinyl Wrote: Mike Thomas is a former Bengal because he had only 2 receptions on 10 targets from the most accurate Quarterback in NFL history.
Mitchell Wilcox? How about 17 receptions on 18 targets.
Our TEs are always check downs/in the flat. Especially Wilcox/Sample/Asiasi. Cannot compare to a WR. Apples & oranges. Though I agree Thomas did not offer much as a receiver and Wilcox at least catches everything thrown his way.
Posts: 3,280
Threads: 103
Reputation:
21459
Joined: Apr 2019
(12-28-2022, 04:21 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: Our TEs are always check downs/in the flat. Especially Wilcox/Sample/Asiasi. Cannot compare to a WR. Apples & oranges. Though I agree Thomas did not offer much as a receiver and Wilcox at least catches everything thrown his way.
Their #2 TEs are always check downs, not whoever is in the role of the #1 TE. They'll be part of the regular downfield passing most of the time. Hurst is #5 in targets with 68, just behind Mixon's 70 targets, so he'll be a check down on some routes but most of the time he's out in a route downfield.
Sample 2 catches for -1 yard -0.5 per catch
Asiasi 2 catches for 5 yards 2.5 per catch
Hurst 48 catches for 400 yards 8.3 avg
Wilcox 17 catches for 139 yards 8.2 avg
As a Bengals fan, I don't know if I've ever been able to post numbers like these next ones in my entire life
Bengals passing yards 4,305
Opponents passing yards 3,389
And that's with Awuzie missing most of the season. Lou is a legend.
Only users lose drugs.
:-)-~~~
Posts: 2,119
Threads: 69
Reputation:
10111
Joined: May 2015
Location: Denver
-The only bengals fan that has never set foot in Cincinnati 1-15-22
1
Posts: 14,952
Threads: 2,155
Reputation:
83909
Joined: May 2015
Winning makes believers of us all
They didn't win and we don't beleive
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
(12-28-2022, 10:28 AM)Housh Wrote: Honestly with Burrow playing the way he is, he IS the window. Tom Brady had 20 different rosters through this career and made all of them at least solid. Peyton Manning made every roster decent.
Guys like Kyler Murray and Ryan Tannehill make rosters WORSE. So of course their windows were super small. Burrow is SMART and can make every throw as if it’s easy. No matter who we have on offense i think Burrow will get points outta them as long as we block for him. The only thing even the great Joe Burrow can’t overcome is pressure getting to him instantly.
Yep. Look no further than the recent performance of guys like Trenton Irwin and Mitchell Wilcox. UDFAs, but with Burrow, playing very, very well.
Posts: 36,558
Threads: 49
Reputation:
236609
Joined: May 2015
Location: Star Valley, Wyoming
(12-28-2022, 12:20 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: While I agree with this in theory, I don't think he really has time most snaps.
True, and always taking such a short drop also kind of negates the pump fake. Need to change something up with the pass deflections.
I am sure Zac and Burrow are very aware of this one weakness at this time.
(12-29-2022, 11:23 PM)pally Wrote:
Cool stat, thanks Pally. 
(12-30-2022, 12:41 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: Yep. Look no further than the recent performance of guys like Trenton Irwin and Mitchell Wilcox. UDFAs, but with Burrow, playing very, very well.
For sure, it is very refreshing.
This is a QB that can push the entire roster to work their hardest and play their best to become the best.
Posts: 28,180
Threads: 353
Reputation:
242417
Joined: Aug 2016
1
Posts: 19,723
Threads: 144
Reputation:
163087
Joined: May 2015
Location: Covington, Ky
Chase needs 96 yards against the Ravens to move into #2 in post season receiving yards for a players first 2 years, ahead of Randy Moss.
He's 275 yards behind Charlie Brown at #1.
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
1
Posts: 36,558
Threads: 49
Reputation:
236609
Joined: May 2015
Location: Star Valley, Wyoming
(01-13-2023, 04:00 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Chase needs 96 yards against the Ravens to move into #2 in post season receiving yards for a players first 2 years, ahead of Randy Moss.
He's 275 yards behind Charlie Brown at #1.
So that Charlie Brown knew how to play football eh? 
Posts: 7,798
Threads: 858
Reputation:
128435
Joined: May 2015
Location: Ohio
The home team has won the last 5 WC games where the teams also played the week before.
Also, home teams in the WC round who are favored by 8 or more are 16-1 since 1997.
1
Posts: 19,723
Threads: 144
Reputation:
163087
Joined: May 2015
Location: Covington, Ky
(01-13-2023, 04:03 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: So that Charlie Brown knew how to play football eh?
He could catch it. Just couldn't kick it. 
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
(01-13-2023, 04:00 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Chase needs 96 yards against the Ravens to move into #2 in post season receiving yards for a players first 2 years, ahead of Randy Moss.
He's 275 yards behind Charlie Brown at #1.
That should be the target. He COULD get that before the Super Bowl, and then beat it against....SF?
Posts: 19,723
Threads: 144
Reputation:
163087
Joined: May 2015
Location: Covington, Ky
(01-13-2023, 06:01 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: That should be the target. He COULD get that before the Super Bowl, and then beat it against....SF?
I'd like to see him get it against the 2nd round opponent.
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
(01-13-2023, 06:04 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: I'd like to see him get it against the 2nd round opponent.
Third round for me....can't stand KC, State Farm (who spends hundreds of millions on ads and does crap for customers), the NFL bias, and I'm sick of the love for Mush Mouth. He played a sissy schedule and the only good win was a beat up SF team that was struggling. Don't hate them like steelers or rats, but just sick of them.
Posts: 19,723
Threads: 144
Reputation:
163087
Joined: May 2015
Location: Covington, Ky
(01-14-2023, 01:19 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: Third round for me....can't stand KC, State Farm (who spends hundreds of millions on ads and does crap for customers), the NFL bias, and I'm sick of the love for Mush Mouth. He played a sissy schedule and the only good win was a beat up SF team that was struggling. Don't hate them like steelers or rats, but just sick of them.
I don't care about Mahomes. What i'm saying is, if he gets it by the 2nd round game, that means he averaged about 138 per game to do it. 
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
(01-14-2023, 01:25 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: I don't care about Mahomes. What i'm saying is, if he gets it by the 2nd round game, that means he averaged about 138 per game to do it.
Good point. I just look at it like: GET BACK TO THE BIG GAME AND WIN IT NO MATTER WHAT. How that plays out stat-wise, I won't know, but I would imagine he would crush it. Kind of makes up for his lost 5 games during the season.
|
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
