Posts: 3,520
Threads: 239
Reputation:
27105
Joined: May 2015
I’ve read some rumors that we are trying to land Henry. Imagine landing that man? Put some diapers on boys, cause there will be a lot of messy pants soon
Or not….
But if someone told you yesterday Brown is coming for 4 years here yesterday would you believe it? Henry in stripes….
Or not…
Posts: 2,980
Threads: 50
Reputation:
10556
Joined: May 2015
Location: Anderson, SC
Who? King Henry? Guy's got a lot of wear and tear over the years. If we had him or Ekeler for one year on a Super Bowl run I'd be for it.
Posts: 13,647
Threads: 366
Reputation:
45930
Joined: May 2015
If we talking King Henry he would have to be traded for and I doubt we trade for a RB (we shouldn't).
Quote:"Success doesn’t mean every single move they make is good" ~ Anonymous
"Let not the dumb have to educate" ~ jj22
Posts: 5,267
Threads: 60
Reputation:
39666
Joined: Mar 2018
Location: Oklahoma
I'm just not on board with a Henry trade. Giving up capital to land a 29 year old back with over 1,700 carries that isn't known for his receiving abilities who will also be expensive. It just doesn't make sense, imo. He's a classic, bulldozing back and is great at what he does but he doesn't fit the offensive that Cincinnati looks to run. I think they'd be better off with a smaller back who can catch well and make plays in space with good pass-pro.
1
Posts: 8,782
Threads: 219
Reputation:
29892
Joined: May 2015
Location: Fredericksburg Virginia
I would rather draft a back then trade for Henry. He'll I'd rather keep Mixon then trade for.Henry!
Posts: 8,492
Threads: 28
Reputation:
96595
Joined: May 2015
Henry on a short term contract would be ok but wouldn't want to pay the price the Titans will probably ask.
Mixon for Henry........Yes
Anything else other than a late round picks, would say no.
The water tastes funny when you're far from your home,
yet it's only the thirsty that hunger to roam.
Roam the Jungle !