Posts: 5,716
Threads: 10
Reputation:
25016
Joined: Apr 2020
(01-25-2024, 01:40 PM)Synric Wrote: I caught alot of flak over Jahmyr Gibbs lol.
I still think it was a bad pick. They needed to go d-line or secondary. And they’d be better if they did
It's because you are of such profound wisdom, Frank Booth. - SunsetBengal
Posts: 7,208
Threads: 51
Reputation:
49684
Joined: May 2015
(01-26-2024, 02:48 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: I still think it was a bad pick. They needed to go d-line or secondary. And they’d be better if they did
There wasn't a DE or DT that had more than 4.5 sacks drafted after Gibbs, who had 11 TD's and over 1200 yards/scrimmage. Unless you're picking Top 10, you don't draft defense to fix your defense. You draft defense to maintain it when contracts expire.
Posts: 8,272
Threads: 97
Reputation:
22175
Joined: Nov 2015
(01-23-2024, 01:04 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: Yoshi & Jones are in no way ready to be #2 receivers. Nor WR3, really.
That is another reason to tag Tee. It buys those guys a year to develop. If Tee has a monster year, his trade value goes up.
$20.7 seems fair to me.
https://www.spotrac.com/news/projected-2024-franchise-tag-candidates-2110/
There is no chance we let Tee walk this year. A tag & trade makes little sense as a team with a first would be better off just taking the WR Rd 1 instead if trading the pick AND paying $20 mil.
Well in a way your thoughts on Yoshi and Jones, support a team trading and paying Tee, the rookie WR they might draft in 2nd or 3rd round probably very likely might not be ready to be a real #1/#2 yet,, where Tee is seasoned and ready. I totally could see a team in the hunt for to make an impact in playoffs that is lacking a high tier WR, looking to trade for Tee giving up a 2nd or 3rd throwing in a late pick and paying him
Posts: 1,833
Threads: 130
Reputation:
13139
Joined: Mar 2017
(01-26-2024, 04:23 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: Well in a way your thoughts on Yoshi and Jones, support a team trading and paying Tee, the rookie WR they might draft in 2nd or 3rd round probably very likely might not be ready to be a real #1/#2 yet,, where Tee is seasoned and ready. I totally could see a team in the hunt for to make an impact in playoffs that is lacking a high tier WR, looking to trade for Tee giving up a 2nd or 3rd throwing in a late pick and paying him
I agree with you that certain Teams may want to Trade for TEE.
For some of the same reasons why the Bengals may want to keep TEE, other Teams may want to get TEE.
Maybe just 3 rookie receivers will go before the Bengals pick. Marvin Harrison Jr, Malik Nabors, Rome Odunze
I would guess that most Teams would prefer Marvin Harrison JR over TEE.
But Teams could prefer a seasoned TEE over Malik Nabors and/or Rome Odunze even though their cheaper. Teams know what they are getting.
Even if the 17 Teams picking ahead of the Bengals all liked the 3 rookies better, all 17 Teams can't be assured of getting one of them making
a Trade up possible using TEE & the Bengals 1st round pick. Or just Trade Tee for a pick or picks (no Trade up)
Or just keep TEE for some of the same reasons other Teams may want to get TEE.
Posts: 10,281
Threads: 182
Reputation:
25098
Joined: May 2015
(01-20-2024, 11:29 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: I’m a trench guy. Lot of people here prefer the weapons though.
Those people are generally wrong
Do any teams left have more money in their O/D lines than their skill positions?
I may look at that later
-Housh
Posts: 7,798
Threads: 858
Reputation:
128435
Joined: May 2015
Location: Ohio
(01-26-2024, 07:33 PM)Housh Wrote: Do any teams left have more money in their O/D lines than their skill positions?
I may look at that later
2023 cap percentages by group:
Lions
O-line: 25.08%
D-line: 10.07%
RB/WR/TE: 11.40%
Chiefs
O-line: 13.82%
D-line: 20.26%
RB/WR/TE: 19.68%
Ravens
O-line: 21.87%
D-line: 8.27%
RB/WR/TE: 18.30%
49ers
O-line: 16.24%
D-line: 17.72%
RB/WR/TE: 15.55%
Bengals
O-line: 19.87%
D-line: 26.14%
RB/WR/TE: 18.27%
Posts: 5,716
Threads: 10
Reputation:
25016
Joined: Apr 2020
(01-26-2024, 08:27 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: 2023 cap percentages by group:
Lions
O-line: 25.08%
D-line: 10.07%
RB/WR/TE: 11.40%
Chiefs
O-line: 13.82%
D-line: 20.26%
RB/WR/TE: 19.68%
Ravens
O-line: 21.87%
D-line: 8.27%
RB/WR/TE: 18.30%
49ers
O-line: 10.84%
D-line: 17.72%
RB/WR/TE: 15.55%
ravens getting a lot out of that d-line
It's because you are of such profound wisdom, Frank Booth. - SunsetBengal
Posts: 38,919
Threads: 922
Reputation:
132491
Joined: May 2015
(01-26-2024, 08:30 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: ravens getting a lot out of that d-line
Most likely because they're the only 3-4. $ is spent on OLB
Posts: 5,716
Threads: 10
Reputation:
25016
Joined: Apr 2020
(01-26-2024, 09:22 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Most likely because they're the only 3-4. $ is spent on OLB
good point
It's because you are of such profound wisdom, Frank Booth. - SunsetBengal
Posts: 28,175
Threads: 352
Reputation:
242382
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 7,208
Threads: 51
Reputation:
49684
Joined: May 2015
(01-26-2024, 09:22 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Most likely because they're the only 3-4. $ is spent on OLB
Madubuike and Washington are on rookie deals that expire this year. Clowney is listed as an OLB, but he's on a 1 year, $2.5 mil deal, as well.
1
Posts: 1,355
Threads: 7
Reputation:
5924
Joined: Sep 2018
The Bengals obviously have some big decisions to make this offseason.I don’t think it’s prudent to keep Tee Higgins on the roster.My first option would be a trade.
Posts: 4,416
Threads: 44
Reputation:
13853
Joined: May 2015
Looking at the 49ers you wonder how they are not over the cap. They save big $ on the QB position so that has to be the reason.
That team is loaded with veteran talent across the entire roster. Maybe DBs aren’t as good/highly priced but other than that…
Posts: 3,425
Threads: 238
Reputation:
14204
Joined: Oct 2016
(01-29-2024, 01:04 PM)Clark W Griswold Wrote: Looking at the 49ers you wonder how they are not over the cap. They save big $ on the QB position so that has to be the reason.
That team is loaded with veteran talent across the entire roster. Maybe DBs aren’t as good/highly priced but other than that…
Just read the Niners top priority this offseason is extending
Brandon Aiyuk. But according to some on here thats money
Not spent well.
Posts: 7,208
Threads: 51
Reputation:
49684
Joined: May 2015
(01-29-2024, 02:13 PM)impactplaya Wrote: Just read the Niners top priority this offseason is extending
Brandon Aiyuk. But according to some on here thats money
Not spent well.
Aiyuk has led them in receiving yards the past two seasons. Meanwhile, Deebo has only had 1 1000 yard season in his career.
Aiyuk is their Chase. Deebo is their Higgins.
Posts: 4,840
Threads: 111
Reputation:
9727
Joined: Sep 2015
Anyone else seeing all these “Browns really want to pursue / sign Tee” blasts all over the internet?
Posts: 28,175
Threads: 352
Reputation:
242382
Joined: Aug 2016
(01-31-2024, 09:21 AM)Whacked Wrote: Anyone else seeing all these “Browns really want to pursue / sign Tee” blasts all over the internet?
Watson made some comment on a podcast about wanting him up there. The funniest thing was some of the Browns fans I saw hyping it up actually thought they played together at Clemson.
Posts: 28,175
Threads: 352
Reputation:
242382
Joined: Aug 2016
Kinda interesting from Duke. I figured tagging Tee was a foregone conclusion but this sounds at least a little uncertain.
*sorry for linking a Kelsey Conway tweet. I promise I don’t follow her.
Posts: 26,208
Threads: 656
Reputation:
247659
Joined: May 2015
Location: Jackson, OH
(01-31-2024, 11:14 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote:
Kinda interesting from Duke. I figured tagging Tee was a foregone conclusion but this sounds at least a little uncertain.
*sorry for linking a Kelsey Conway tweet. I promise I don’t follow her.
Well, it was her own article that contained the Duke Tobin quote.
Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations
-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Posts: 28,175
Threads: 352
Reputation:
242382
Joined: Aug 2016
(01-31-2024, 11:27 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Well, it was her own article that contained the Duke Tobin quote.
Right, but I can’t stand her so it makes me feel dirty.
|