***Week 18 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Steelers***

[jfkbengals]

I almost wanted to go for it there. From what we have seen of Pitts offense thus far, I don't know if they are going to get points on a drive starting on their own 5, so why not try for the 6 instead of the 3.

[Timanky12]

Keeping Pitt in the game with all these FG’s. One TD and they are back in it

[Housh]

Wierdly bad read but Burrow there.....Why would Gesicki had sat down that close to the safety. Sitting down where BUrrow threw it wouldve made it a contested catch instead of the wide open one Gesicki had when he just kept running

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(01-05-2025, 12:31 AM)jj22 Wrote: They have to tag Tee again. To much of an injury risk to pay long term. Not with Burrow and Chase. Now if he was the Offemse maybe you take the risk but he’s not.

No, they don't.

[Frank Booth]

(01-05-2025, 12:31 AM)jj22 Wrote: They have to tag Tee again. To much of an injury risk to pay long term. Not with Burrow and Chase. Now if he was the Offemse maybe you take the risk but he’s not.

tagging him is giving him too much money. Just let him walk. He truly only plays like 9 healthy games per year, leaves another 3 early like tonight, and then misses the rest outright.

[t3r3e3]

(01-05-2025, 12:31 AM)iowahwky4cinci Wrote: Teams know he's injury prone. That will affect what they're willing to pay him. That includes the Bengals.

25 million/yr is the floor for Tee. Someone will pay it.

[Housh]

(01-05-2025, 12:32 AM)Timanky12 Wrote: Keeping Pitt in the game with all these FG’s. One TD and they are back in it

Not really


We only need a FG to kinda screw the,

[Bengalion]

Time Possession:

Bengals - 34:44
Stoolers - 14:10

[Nicomo Cosca]

(01-05-2025, 12:32 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: No, they don't.

I mean they definitely shouldn’t let him walk for nothing. At least tag and trade him.

[NUGDUKWE]

(01-05-2025, 12:30 AM)Frank Booth Wrote: no they dont. and theyll regret it

you have 2 very talented RB's and money that has to go elsewhere

The Bengals are in the shape they are in because they let talent walk out the door that they still haven't replaced. We are gonna let more talent walk that we have to try and replace another spot while our QB is saying as much as he can publicly that he wants him back.

[Whacked]

Plenty of time left for CrapsBurgh

We reallllllly needed 7

[Frank Booth]

(01-05-2025, 12:33 AM)Housh Wrote: Not really


We only need a FG to kinda screw the,

you assume theres no bengal turnovers rest of game

[Bengalstripes9]

I don’t understand every time they get goal to go how they either throw a pass short of the goal line or run a draw and wait until third down to take a shot at the endzone.

[WildCat]

(01-05-2025, 12:32 AM)Frank Booth Wrote: tagging him is giving him too much money. Just let him walk. He truly only plays like 9 healthy games per year, leaves another 3 early like tonight, and then misses the rest outright.

no you don't do that after all the dropping his agent to get jamar's agent.

[Frank Booth]

(01-05-2025, 12:33 AM)NUGDUKWE Wrote: The Bengals are in the shape they are in because they let talent walk out the door that they still haven't replaced. We are gonna let more talent walk that we have to try and replace another spot while our QB is saying as much as he can publicly that he wants him back.

youre gonna regret it when theres no money to put anywhere else and Higgins is missing 5 weeks with a hamstring ankle combo

[Housh]

Like Davis-Gaither alongside Pratt ngl


Not better than Wilson but hes gotta get more snaps when Wilson is healthy

[Timanky12]

Time for a D stop

[Frank Booth]

(01-05-2025, 12:34 AM)WildCat Wrote: no you don't do that after all the dropping his agent to get jamar's agent.

thats his fault. I called him a moron for doing that. Joe really screwed up tee's money with that move

[Clark W Griswold]

Need Trey to get another sack here

[Whacked]

We better not pull that prevent crap too early like we always do