ESPN Predicts That We Trade For Kyle Pitts!

[kurisu]

Let’s just keep Gesicki!

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

(4 hours ago)Whatever Wrote: But Hudson has great ball security...

Too soon, sorry.

And sure is a favorite of Truck's....

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

(3 hours ago)kurisu Wrote: Let’s just keep Gesicki!

I agree. I think Mike will just get better with Burrow in year 2 in the system and with more trust.

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

Watch him go to KC with a Kelce retirement.

[*rfaulk34*]

(4 hours ago)jason Wrote: No!

Already got em. 





Time to blast em off.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That was tomorrow's batch. I'll be back to shoot off some later days, later. 

[007BengalsFan]

At what point do you call it like it is?  Pitts just isnt as good as his hype.  Some claim the Atlanta passing game is to fault.  Atlanta had the #5 passing offense in the NFL this year so obviously they did pretty good throwing the ball.  Do you really think they were just ignoring him?  If you cant put up the numbers in a top 5 NFL passing offense whose fault is that?  It seems like its everyones fault but Pitts when other guys had no problem producing.

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

(2 hours ago)007BengalsFan Wrote: At what point do you call it like it is?  Pitts just isnt as good as his hype.  Some claim the Atlanta passing game is to fault.  Atlanta had the #5 passing offense in the NFL this year so obviously they did pretty good throwing the ball.  Do you really think they were just ignoring him?  If you cant put up the numbers in a top 5 NFL passing offense whose fault is that?  It seems like its everyones fault but Pitts when other guys had no problem producing.

Pitts must of been dropping balls in practice or something. I saw him open many times in games and whether it was Cousins or Penix they
instead went to Drake London most of the time the sure handed top WR for the Falcons.

[SunsetBengal]

(5 hours ago)schroomytunes Wrote: Hard no from me! We can sign Gesicki back for less $$$ than that and still hold onto our draft pick, and sign another role player for that same 10 million. I'm thinking we trade back in the 1st round this year to gain an additional 2nd or 3rd anyway, so I think we are going to value draft spots to address the trenches this year.

So, I guess we can put you down as a big fan of Mike Brown's bargain shopping deals from over the years? 

[J24]

I could see us trading for him if we lost both Higgins and Mike G.

[jj22]

(3 hours ago)kurisu Wrote: Let’s just keep Gesicki!

Right. If we trading let's hope the focus is on DT prospects given the FA pool. 

[Whatever]

(2 hours ago)007BengalsFan Wrote: At what point do you call it like it is?  Pitts just isnt as good as his hype.  Some claim the Atlanta passing game is to fault.  Atlanta had the #5 passing offense in the NFL this year so obviously they did pretty good throwing the ball.  Do you really think they were just ignoring him?  If you cant put up the numbers in a top 5 NFL passing offense whose fault is that?  It seems like its everyones fault but Pitts when other guys had no problem producing.

I mean, he was 13th among TE's in receiving yards.  He did produce, but again, not at the elite levels projected.  

[007BengalsFan]

(1 hour ago)Whatever Wrote: I mean, he was 13th among TE's in receiving yards.  He did produce, but again, not at the elite levels projected.  

I dont think he is a bad TE at all.  He is good.  He is just not the generational TE everyone thought he was going to be coming out of the draft.  I wouldnt count on him being a #2 option.  If you let Tee walk, you cant think Pitts is going to be a replacement #2.  If you keep Tee, you cant pay Burrow, Chase, Higgins and then use a draft pick to trade for Pitts and then pay him 10 million per year as your 3rd option.