"...but at least it'll be fun to watch"

[kalibengal]

(03-18-2025, 03:45 PM)bengalsboy Wrote: Maybe But the Chargers,did not have a DE,like Trey Hendrickson.Get some defensive players,in the draft.And,the defense can get better.

The Chargers did have some good Defenders back in that time
Fred Dean was a modern day speed rusher at 235#
Louie Kelcher was a big run stuffing DT that could collapse the pocket and Gary "big hands " johnson was very good 3 t type of DT
DE Leroy jones wasnt too shabby either and was about 6'-7 "... but for one reason or another they couldnt make it to SB  

[SunsetBengal]

(9 hours ago)Bengalstripes9 Wrote: The Bengals are earily similar to the Colts with Manning.

I would say the big difference is that Burrow actually beat Mahomes a few times early in his career.
And Burrow has had more injuries as well.

But the overall team makeup is quite similar.

It took Manning a long time to win it all. 
His defense was never good enough--until it was, and they won a championship.

And here, all this time I thought that it was them getting Vinatieri that put them over the top..

[Soonerpeace]

(9 hours ago)samhain Wrote: I really hope that's not the belief in-house.  Trey and some guys ain't gonna do it.  They need at least one more guy that can get pressure, either on the edge or up the middle.  

Slaton is a mountain and B J is B J. They’ve got Jenkins and Jackson. They may go round 3. Probably going G then LB.

[Bengalstripes9]

(9 hours ago)NUGDUKWE Wrote: Manning did not deal with pressure well. Burrow definitely has him beat in that regard.

(8 hours ago)samhain Wrote: Warren wears 44.  Just like Manning's TE did.  Just saying.

Also, I think Manning had better lines most of the time.  Maybe not always loaded with superstars, but played well as a unit.  Also had a hellacious running back that was a star in his own right.

There are certainly differences. But they are investing in similar position groups. I think the colts had a lesser known back when they won the Super Bowl. Addai was a smaller back.

Burrow is a better qb in my opinion as well. Moves much better in the pocket and runs better.

[*ochocincos*]

(9 hours ago)Sled21 Wrote: Why do you even watch regular season games then? Seriously, some of you guys take something that is supposed to be fun and make it the most miserable thing you act like you're forced to do. If it's that miserable for you, why do it? I'll never understand it.

I don't watch all of them. Usually just ones I think will be good matchups.
I also typically stop watching once the Bengals get eliminated from playoffs.

Watching a winning team is fun for me.
It's not fun to watch a continually losing team.
That's why I stop when if/when it gets to that point.


So, to your point, I do something that is fun to me and don't do it when it's not.

[sandwedge]

(03-18-2025, 12:20 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: I don't think relying on the same players will yield drastically different results. This is a team that missed the playoffs 2 years in a row.

Definitely needs more talent infusion be it from the draft or free agency.

Part of my optimism for a better D this year is:
1) Early last season our DL was hit hard by the injury bug, Rankins, Hill, Jackson and Jenkins
2) Dax and Turner go down, season ending injuries
3) Wilson goes on IR
4) A lot of Rookies were getting a lot playing time, they showed they were rookies, but played well down the stretch
5) Slaton is being way underrated on here. Led the league for DTs for run stopping percentage
6) We will add some very good talent in the draft.

I believe this D will end up better than last year