2 hours ago
Trey still has at least 3 years of 10+ sacks in him.
Take it to the bank.
Take it to the bank.

![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
"Hope is not a strategy"
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
Trey Hendrickson Update
|
2 hours ago
Trey still has at least 3 years of 10+ sacks in him.
Take it to the bank. ![]() ![]() "Hope is not a strategy"
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
2 hours ago
(2 hours ago)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: There's no way that Stewart could produce in 2025 a number would make any team comfortable having him as their only DE heading into 2026 instead of tagging Hendrickson for $25m-ish. Yep, and in 2026 we have another chance to draft a DE in the 1st, and/or pick one up in free agency. You act like Hendrickson is just going to continue to play at the same level over the next three years. History says otherwise. If he were 25, I wouldn't be making this argument. He's not. He's going to slow down. Father time beats all. That is why he is so desperate for guarantees. He knows it, the Bengals know it. ![]()
2 hours ago
(2 hours ago)Sled21 Wrote: Yep, and in 2026 we have another chance to draft a DE in the 1st, and/or pick one up in free agency. You act like Hendrickson is just going to continue to play at the same level over the next three years. History says otherwise. If he were 25, I wouldn't be making this argument. He's not. He's going to slow down. Father time beats all. That is why he is so desperate for guarantees. He knows it, the Bengals know it. Trey still has 3 years of 10+ sacks in him!!! Bank!!!!! Take it there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ![]() "Hope is not a strategy"
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
2 hours ago
(2 hours ago)rfaulk34 Wrote: Trey still has 3 years of 10+ sacks in him!!! I don't dsisagree, so how much do 10 sack guy gets paid versus 17.5 sack guys is the question the FO has to determine, as 30 + sacks 52.5 sacks is a huge downward trend, ![]() On to 2025, let's save the drama for the off season.
2 hours ago
(2 hours ago)Sled21 Wrote: Yep, and in 2026 we have another chance to draft a DE in the 1st, and/or pick one up in free agency. You act like Hendrickson is just going to continue to play at the same level over the next three years. History says otherwise. If he were 25, I wouldn't be making this argument. He's not. He's going to slow down. Father time beats all. That is why he is so desperate for guarantees. He knows it, the Bengals know it. You’d have more of an argument if we didn’t just see 30 year old Watt and 29 year old Garrett get exactly the guarantees Trey wants. It’s unreasonable to expect him to settle for less. ![]()
2 hours ago
2 hours ago
(2 hours ago)Luvnit2 Wrote: I don't dsisagree, so how much do 10 sack guy gets paid versus 17.5 sack guys is the question the FO has to determine, as 30 + sacks 52.5 sacks is a huge downward trend, For me, the 10(+/-) is more in year 3 and beyond. I'd still expect mid teens for the next 2 years. ![]() "Hope is not a strategy"
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
2 hours ago
(2 hours ago)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: You’d have more of an argument if we didn’t just see 30 year old Watt and 29 year old Garrett get exactly the guarantees Trey wants. It’s unreasonable to expect him to settle for less. Well there you go, when you start using Cleveland as an example of doing things right.... well..... ![]() ![]()
2 hours ago
"Other teams may regret the deals later, so instead I am going to create a situation that I will certainly regret NOW!" - Someone playing 4D chess instead of checkers, probably.
_________________________________________________
“I feel really excited about where our defense is at."
"I love where our defense is at." - Zac Taylor 8/18/25 ![]()
1 hour ago
(2 hours ago)Sled21 Wrote: Well there you go, when you start using Cleveland as an example of doing things right.... well..... Yeah, Pittsburgh and Cleveland know nothing about building good defenses. ![]() ![]()
1 hour ago
(2 hours ago)rfaulk34 Wrote: For me, the 10(+/-) is more in year 3 and beyond. I'd still expect mid teens for the next 2 years. I hope we sign and he gets 20 sacks in 2024,but no given when he peaks. That is the issue FO has to deal with and why the guaranteed money is such an issue. I think we should offer a deal with a 2 year guararatee and in year 3 low base + roster bonus + per sack incentive. I think that is a very fair compromise for both sides. If we are only offering a 1 year guarantee, to me that is not enough. But, I do think some of year 2 should also be sack bases, get the sacks and get more dough. ![]() On to 2025, let's save the drama for the off season.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|