Posts: 3,567
Threads: 244
Reputation:
27583
Joined: May 2015
Well all three coaches are going to the post season this year. Which one gets the win first?
"If the most important thing is the financials' and the second most important thing is winning, then you don't have a chance. It's so important for ownership to do what it takes to win"
Posts: 13,473
Threads: 504
Joined: May 2015
Location: South Florida
Well it depends. We won't play till week 2 so probably jay or Zim
Or do you mean their first win?
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
Probably been said, but I think Gruden has the skins playing well enough to knock off an Atlanta team or a Seahwak team at home in the wildcard round.
Marvin and Zim get their wins a week later.
Posts: 5,559
Threads: 82
Reputation:
25610
Joined: May 2015
Location: Florida
(12-28-2015, 12:37 AM)GodFather Wrote: Well all three coaches are going to the post season this year. Which one gets the win first?
It comes down to the scheduling. With a bye week Lewis can only win a playoff game first if the other two lose in the first round, as neither of them will have a bye.
Also, Zimmer and Gruden might be matched up against each other in the first round, which would mean Lewis won't be the first one to win a playoff game.
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
I would love to see Marvin vs. Zim in the Super Bowl.
Posts: 2,138
Threads: 291
Reputation:
7221
Joined: May 2015
Location: Indiana
Zimmer since the Vikings will be playing in the Wildcard game agains the Redskins.
The Bengals will have the bye, so it will be Zimmer.
Song of Solomon 2:15
Take us the foxes, the little foxes, that spoil the vines: for our vines have tender grapes.
Posts: 13,473
Threads: 504
Joined: May 2015
Location: South Florida
Jay and Zim would play either Seattle or Green Bay. If Zim wins next week at GB then jay plays the pack. And Hawks go to Zim.
Both could easily win those games.
Then Marvin wins In round 2 vs Denver or the Chefs.
Posts: 2,960
Threads: 27
Reputation:
18596
Joined: May 2015
Two of them: Lewis and Zimmer.
Posts: 2,114
Threads: 20
Reputation:
6805
Joined: May 2015
All 3 have a good chance to win a game. Zimmer has the Vikings defense playing like one of the best in the league. Marv has the most overall talent of the 3 on his roster it just depends if Dalton comes back. Now Gruden...
He got a ton of hate on the mothership. Some deserved, some not, but who would have thought he'd have the Redskins in the playoffs in his 2nd year and RGIII is an after thought. Under Gruden, Kirk Cousins is leading the league in completion percentage and they are practically unbeatable at home as of late.
Posts: 526
Threads: 21
Reputation:
2196
Joined: May 2015
Location: Philly
Zimmer will win a game before Lewis because Zim will be playing Wild Card weekend, Lewis won't.
Posts: 15,160
Threads: 122
Reputation:
49807
Joined: May 2015
Location: Hyborea
Actually the Redskins and Vikings will play to a tie, and the referees will forget that you cannot end in a tie in the playoffs. This will finally push the league to fix the officiating
Posts: 2,960
Threads: 27
Reputation:
18596
Joined: May 2015
(12-28-2015, 12:47 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: I would love to see Marvin vs. Zim in the Super Bowl.
I would not love to see that at all. Zim knows our defense too well.
Posts: 3,827
Threads: 36
Reputation:
21840
Joined: May 2015
Zimmer will be facing Gruden while Lewis has a bye, so it will literally be impossible for Lewis to be the first with a win.
I'd pick Zimmer simply because the Vikings are a much better team than the Washington Football Club.
Posts: 4,829
Threads: 107
Reputation:
22659
Joined: May 2015
Location: An undisclosed biological research facility
Shaking my head at those who think the poll is asking about timing of first win (wildcard weekend vs division weekend).
Posts: 3,827
Threads: 36
Reputation:
21840
Joined: May 2015
(12-28-2015, 11:18 AM)Beaker Wrote: Shaking my head at those who think the poll is asking about timing of first win (wildcard weekend vs division weekend).
Shaking my head at those who think that one team getting a win one week and another team getting a win the next week = both teams getting wins at the same time.
Posts: 4,829
Threads: 107
Reputation:
22659
Joined: May 2015
Location: An undisclosed biological research facility
(12-28-2015, 11:56 AM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: Shaking my head at those who think that one team getting a win one week and another team getting a win the next week = both teams getting wins at the same time.
It was obvious he was trying to question which coach would get their playoff win first....regardless of which weekend their team played. Do we really have to question his placement of the word "first"?
Posts: 2,338
Threads: 14
Reputation:
6625
Joined: May 2015
Location: Southern Tier, NY
(12-28-2015, 12:07 PM)Beaker Wrote: It was obvious he was trying to question which coach would get their playoff win first....regardless of which weekend their team played. Do we really have to question his placement of the word "first"?
^^^^^this^^^^^ C'mon Man!!!!!!
Posts: 187
Threads: 5
Reputation:
150
Joined: May 2015
Location: DMV
Well considering 2 of them might be playing each other it's easy to pick two. But I think it's summer and Marvin.
"The Power of life and death is in the tongue"
Posts: 3,567
Threads: 244
Reputation:
27583
Joined: May 2015
(12-28-2015, 12:07 PM)Beaker Wrote: It was obvious he was trying to question which coach would get their playoff win first....regardless of which weekend their team played. Do we really have to question his placement of the word "first"?
I know, my god I read the responses and thought do I need to be so damn detailed in my description.
"If the most important thing is the financials' and the second most important thing is winning, then you don't have a chance. It's so important for ownership to do what it takes to win"
Posts: 2,960
Threads: 27
Reputation:
18596
Joined: May 2015
(12-28-2015, 03:53 PM)GodFather Wrote: I know, my god I read the responses and thought do I need to be so damn detailed in my description.
It seemed obvious to me since (all 3) and (2 of them) were choices.
|