Posts: 40,628
Threads: 1,062
Joined: May 2015
(01-12-2016, 03:54 PM)GreenCornBengal Wrote: Making a mistake In the first quarter is much less of a problem than making a mistake with < 2mins to go on the opposing 20.
And making a mistake that gives the other team a chip shot for the game winning FG is much worse than giving the opposing team the ball no where close to scoring position.
There is no logic to your argument. It seems like you just have something personal against Hill. His fumble was abig mistake, but the defense still has to blown it for the Steelers to win. If they had recovered the fumble even close to scoring position I might give him more blame, but this loss is not any more on Hill then the rest of the Bengals who made mistakes earlier in the game.
Posts: 136
Threads: 7
Reputation:
560
Joined: Oct 2015
So many what if's
Rey Drops an int that would of taken away points from Pitt.
McCarron fumbles after we get our biggest play of the night.
What if we stop them on 4th and 3 to end the game.
What if AJ takes the check down and doesn't throw the pick.
What if we get the two point conversion.
Posts: 6,201
Threads: 13
Reputation:
45971
Joined: May 2015
Location: Good Times
Momentum was swung by the pick.
Which took skill.
All the offense had to do is run some time off.
They couldn't even do that right.
Which took lack of skill.
Emotions went into the garbage can at that point.
Yet Burfict was still trying to help in a play.
The amount of help and malicious intent is in that of the beholder.
Let's just go by what we know and not what we project with unknown opinions.
Posts: 195
Threads: 3
Reputation:
259
Joined: Jul 2015
The madness hasn't diminished because now people have had a chance to analyze all the bias and BS. There were enough bad calls by the ref to swing the game and the commentators seemed like they were intent on covering for them.
They let the Steeler's act like jackasses after an obvious no call on Gio that results in a turnover. Comment was "that's unfortunate" like targeting helmet to helmet is a new rule? Then for the game decider they paint Burficit's hit as violent and dirty when it really was the unfortunate hit. I didn't realize at the time but Porter broke a rule just by being on the field regardless of Brown's injury. He was obviously taunting Bengal players but they don't flag him. It would at least offset the Jones flag and should have been thrown.
The more scrutiny this game gets the better. People are starting to see the Bias in the NFL we're just the latest victim.
Posts: 10,262
Threads: 180
Reputation:
24836
Joined: May 2015
I'm still looking for a pic or anything that shows Porter checking on Antonio Brown. Or did he go out see he was ok then act an ass? They tried plugging that rule that he's allowed to be on the field of he's showing concern for an injured player but that's been debunked. One the rule says he's not part of the group allowed on the field for injury, two Brown was never hurt and didn't even go thru concussion protocol, and 3 I still don't think he was on the field for Antonio Brown.
Posts: 45
Threads: 4
Reputation:
249
Joined: May 2015
Yes Hill fumbled but Shazier also made a great play to strip it.
Saying Hill is responsible for Burficts suspension makes no sense.
The only one responsible for Burficts suspension is Burfict. He was out of control.
Pacman's penalty should have been offset with a penalty on Porter.
That said, Pacman is an idiot and needs to go on vacation someplace without mainstream or social media.
Agreed - the madness has not diminished
![[Image: 51209558878_91a895e0bb_m.jpg]](https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51209558878_91a895e0bb_m.jpg)
