03-11-2016, 02:23 PM
Funny how the brain works. I read Manziel had been cut, then came here and swore this thread was titled "Browns need a QB".
Broncos need a QB
|
03-11-2016, 02:23 PM
Funny how the brain works. I read Manziel had been cut, then came here and swore this thread was titled "Browns need a QB".
03-11-2016, 02:50 PM
(03-11-2016, 02:19 PM)Go Cards Wrote: Putting this much stock in a back up QB is the same mentality that keeps Bengals from getting over the hump. To the first bold: Uh... that's the exact opposite of what happened. They didn't roll the dice. They kept a competent backup who helped them in a few games until the starter (Manning) returned. If you want to roll the dice like Denver, keep AJM for two years and then let him walk. To the second bold: Trading your backup QB for picks is drafting a player for down the road. Honestly, who are we going to get with a second-fourth round pick that's going to start? Outside of a wide receiver (which is a gamble in any round), there's almost zero chance whoever we draft is going to supplant someone this year. DT and LB are needs, but Marvin is not going to start a rookie at either of those spots unless there's a catastrophic accident and every member of the line or LB corps doesn't play.
03-11-2016, 03:41 PM
Traded for Sanchez
03-11-2016, 03:44 PM
Just heard on NFL Network that Bengals are not going to trade McCarron.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|