Posts: 4,748
Threads: 108
Reputation:
9364
Joined: Sep 2015
Who would you rather have?
I watched NFL Network's "A Football Life" on Chad Johnson (loved it) and it brought back memories of both Palmer and Chad. Man were they fun to watch when they clicked!
IMO:
Palmer > AD
Chad = AJ (both superstars but totally different style receivers)
Posts: 4,361
Threads: 26
Reputation:
19347
Joined: May 2015
Location: Lake Placid, NY
The Chad/TJ/Palmer offense was and still is my favorite era of Bengal football. I'm still a little bummed we never got to see Palmer throw to AJ but hey, things change.
Posts: 28,757
Threads: 40
Reputation:
126716
Joined: May 2015
Location: Parts Unknown, PA
Why choose? We had both...actually, Marvn had both. Bah, I feel like we should have won something by now!
Posts: 4,390
Threads: 52
Reputation:
11979
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cincinnati, OH
(10-02-2016, 10:20 AM)Nately120 Wrote: Why choose? We had both...actually, Marvn had both. Bah, I feel like we should have won something by now!
We forgot to cut the head off of a live rooster for the football Gods that year, so our starting QBs got hurt the years we would have won it all.
Posts: 25,746
Threads: 647
Reputation:
241703
Joined: May 2015
Location: Jackson, OH
I like the Andy/AJ combo the best.
However, has anyone ever wondered just how prolific the Blake/Pickens/Dillon offense could have been, had they had a defense that could shut teams down?
Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations
-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Posts: 2,114
Threads: 20
Reputation:
6805
Joined: May 2015
(10-02-2016, 10:20 AM)Nately120 Wrote: Why choose? We had both...actually, Marvn had both. Bah, I feel like we should have won something by now!
Bingo 
Posts: 6,201
Threads: 13
Reputation:
45971
Joined: May 2015
Location: Good Times
(10-02-2016, 10:33 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: I like the Andy/AJ combo the best.
However, has anyone ever wondered just how prolific the Blake/Pickens/Dillon offense could have been, had they had a defense that could shut teams down?
They also had McGee and Darnay Scott.
With the current year's D they would have been tough to beat !
Posts: 325
Threads: 13
Reputation:
1449
Joined: May 2015
Location: OBXNC
(10-02-2016, 09:37 AM)Whacked Wrote: Who would you rather have?
I watched NFL Network's "A Football Life" on Chad Johnson (loved it) and it brought back memories of both Palmer and Chad. Man were they fun to watch when they clicked!
IMO:
Palmer > AD
Chad = AJ (both superstars but totally different style receivers)
All four are highly skilled players, but I have to give the edge to Dalton and Green because of their "team first" attitude. Palmer and Chad tended to be "me first" players.
Posts: 19,589
Threads: 144
Reputation:
161659
Joined: May 2015
Location: Covington, Ky
Dalton/Green should last longer and put up much better numbers over their time. More playoff appearances and hopefully wins too.
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
Posts: 4,748
Threads: 108
Reputation:
9364
Joined: Sep 2015
(10-02-2016, 09:54 AM)Pat5775 Wrote: The Chad/TJ/Palmer offense was and still is my favorite era of Bengal football. I'm still a little bummed we never got to see Palmer throw to AJ but hey, things change.
Same. I share your sentiment on all.
Posts: 11,469
Threads: 19
Reputation:
78800
Joined: May 2015
Location: Where Mr. Kotter was before returning
(10-02-2016, 10:33 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: I like the Andy/AJ combo the best.
However, has anyone ever wondered just how prolific the Blake/Pickens/Dillon offense could have been, had they had a defense that could shut teams down?
Hell, I wish we had Dillon now.
I'm gonna break every record they've got. I'm tellin' you right now. I don't know how I'm gonna do it, but it's goin' to get done.
- Ja'Marr Chase
April 2021
Posts: 4,748
Threads: 108
Reputation:
9364
Joined: Sep 2015
^That would be SICK
Dude didn't need an O-Line. Lol
Posts: 25,746
Threads: 647
Reputation:
241703
Joined: May 2015
Location: Jackson, OH
(10-02-2016, 01:28 PM)jason Wrote: Hell, I wish we had Dillon now.
Heck, I'd be thrilled with Willie Anderson and Richie Braham.
Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations
-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Posts: 126
Threads: 7
Reputation:
670
Joined: May 2015
Palmer/Green would have loved to see that
Posts: 296
Threads: 0
Reputation:
446
Joined: May 2015
AJ/AD hands down for me. The season we had before we drafted those guys did it for me. What did we win 4 games with our superstars? Then 2 rookies come in and we are a perennial playoff team right away. Attitude and locker room presence does wonders. Chad could've been one of the best ever, but when he turned into Ocho, he threw it away.
Posts: 61
Threads: 0
Reputation:
36
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 28,757
Threads: 40
Reputation:
126716
Joined: May 2015
Location: Parts Unknown, PA
(10-02-2016, 10:24 AM)Brownshoe Wrote: We forgot to cut the head off of a live rooster for the football Gods that year, so our starting QBs got hurt the years we would have won it all.
Part of me believes that, and then part of me wonders why we were TOTALLY SUPPOSED TO WIN IT ALL in only the exact 2 out of the 12 years we had Palmer and Dalton. Pretty specific and convenient we weren't "supposed" to win it all in the 9 seasons they were healthy.
Posts: 4,390
Threads: 52
Reputation:
11979
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cincinnati, OH
(10-03-2016, 12:25 AM)Nately120 Wrote: Part of me believes that, and then part of me wonders why we were TOTALLY SUPPOSED TO WIN IT ALL in only the exact 2 out of the 12 years we had Palmer and Dalton. Pretty specific and convenient we weren't "supposed" to win it all in the 9 seasons they were healthy.
Could you honestly say that 2005 and 2015 weren't the best years the team had under either QB? Both of those years our team was much better than any other year under those QBs. In 2015 both the defense and the offense were playing lights out. In 2005 the offense was playing really well, and the defense caused a lot of turnovers.
Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
(10-02-2016, 10:33 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: I like the Andy/AJ combo the best.
However, has anyone ever wondered just how prolific the Blake/Pickens/Dillon offense could have been, had they had a defense that could shut teams down?
Well you know I have. 
Blake/Pickens (with no Dillon) led the Bengals to a pair of 7-9 seasons and an 8-8 season...with a terrible defense and run game. They single handedly made the Bengals exciting and competitive for a few seasons.
Fwiw, Blake only started one season (12 games) with Dillon. 1998. But by that point, the team wasn't really behind Blake, and Pickens was declining. Plus the defense was still putrid. They finshed 4-12, but I think they swept the Steelers that year, so that's always good.
As for the OP - I'll take Andy over Palmer by a nose and AJ over Chad by a nose. The Chad/TJ days were probably my favorite as a Bengals fan. You have to feel like they could've accomplished more, but they led the team out of the abyss, and I'll always remember them fondly for that.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Posts: 5,559
Threads: 82
Reputation:
25610
Joined: May 2015
Location: Florida
(10-02-2016, 09:37 AM)Whacked Wrote: Who would you rather have?
I watched NFL Network's "A Football Life" on Chad Johnson (loved it) and it brought back memories of both Palmer and Chad. Man were they fun to watch when they clicked!
IMO:
Palmer > AD
Chad = AJ (both superstars but totally different style receivers)
Palmer left whining while Dalton has been a team player. So I'll take Dalton over Palmer. Who needs the headaches?
Chad was great! AJ is great! Both great is their own way but both scare defenses.
|
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
![[Image: 85d8232ebbf088d606250ddec1641e7b.jpg]](https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/85/d8/23/85d8232ebbf088d606250ddec1641e7b.jpg)
![[Image: 51209558878_91a895e0bb_m.jpg]](https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51209558878_91a895e0bb_m.jpg)
