Perfect landing spot for McCarron?

[Bengalboy]

Probably already been said but :

"Agent Jackson.... your second mission should you chose to accept it"

[grampahol]

Nah..they'll let him walk for a 7th round compensation pick.. Dare I say it's the Bengals way?

[CJD]

(12-16-2016, 10:09 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Straight up, for Nick Mangold?

I think I''d want more than a 2 or 3 year stop gap at Center (albeit a great one ) for a perceived potential franchise QB with a QB poor draft coming up.

First round picks only. Other offers need not reply .

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

(12-15-2016, 11:45 PM)Cure4CF Wrote: Urban for Head Coach

Atleast he is good at what he does, but Marv was a good Defensive Coordinator too.

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

(12-16-2016, 12:08 AM)THE PISTONS Wrote: I'd trade him. Next season is his last year here...then he leaves for nothing.

That said, I'm not sure the Jets would be interested.

If they are, do it i agree.

(12-16-2016, 10:09 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Straight up, for Nick Mangold?

Hell yeah, doubt they would go for that though haha

[wolfkaosaun]

I don't see the Jets trading for McCarron. They have Petty (not a fan of him honestly) and they spent a 2nd round pick on Hackenberg last year. Sure, they could add him to the QB competition, but I doubt they would.

I think two better landing spots would be the Bears and Cardinals.

Cardinals mostly because of their style of offense and they will need a QB. Plus they probably will miss out on a QB this draft.
Bears seem to want to move away from Cutler, and I think it depends where they want to draft a QB. If they miss out, then I could see the trade.

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

(12-16-2016, 05:54 PM)wolfkaosaun Wrote: I don't see the Jets trading for McCarron. They have Petty (not a fan of him honestly) and they spent a 2nd round pick on Hackenberg last year. Sure, they could add him to the QB competition, but I doubt they would.

I think two better landing spots would be the Bears and Cardinals.

Cardinals mostly because of their style of offense and they will need a QB. Plus they probably will miss out on a QB this draft.
Bears seem to want to move away from Cutler, and I think it depends where they want to draft a QB. If they miss out, then I could see the trade.

Didn't think of the Cardinals.

[magikod]

If the price is right, I cannot argue.

[wolfkaosaun]

(12-16-2016, 06:00 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Didn't think of the Cardinals.

They're going to be rebuilding that offense. Palmer should be done. Fitz is leaving. They released Floyd.

Bruce Arians likes a pocket passer. My biggest concern is Arians also likes to have a vertical offense. Something I don't see McCarron fitting with.

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

(12-16-2016, 06:19 PM)wolfkaosaun Wrote: They're going to be rebuilding that offense. Palmer should be done. Fitz is leaving. They released Floyd.

Bruce Arians likes a pocket passer. My biggest concern is Arians also likes to have a vertical offense. Something I don't see McCarron fitting with.

I keep hearing people say McCarron doesn't have a strong arm but he threw some nice deep balls last season.

[Derrick]

(12-16-2016, 12:54 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Atleast he is good at what he does, but Marv was a good Defensive Coordinator too.

He must have left all his defensive coordinator knowledge in Baltimore then.

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

(12-16-2016, 06:26 PM)Derrick Wrote: He must have left all his defensive coordinator knowledge in Baltimore then.

He just wasn't made for being a good Head Coach.

Sometimes Coordinators just aren't even if they are good Coordinators.

[grampahol]

How can anyone be so cruel as to want McCarron to want to go to the 49ers? What did he ever do to you guys?

[Alleyviper13]

Perfect landing spot? ill list them in order lol, many teams need him. Im not saying hes great but he could possibly solid and great in the right system with a good O LINE

Broncos- Siemians blah
Minnesota- depends on bridgewater
Bears- Cutler is prolly gonzo
Patriots- back up brady for a few then take over
Bills- start right away, their defense is decent
Jets- yikes
Browns- yikes
49ers- he probably wouldnt
Rams- would start day one over goff but they wouldnt risk that media carnival
Jaguars- Bortles and him are similar....but their defense sucks and o line isnt that great

[*SHRacerX*]

(12-16-2016, 11:33 AM)grampahol Wrote: Nah..they'll let him walk for a 7th round compensation pick.. Dare I say it's the Bengals way?

I doubt this is what McCarron would bring as a compensatory pick.  The value is what his contract would be, and since he would be done with his rookie contract, teams could sign him long term....unless there are very high-end WRs, DEs, etc out there as well, you would think a FA QB would be in the top 8 of contracts and that would make him a third round compensatory pick.

Which brings another key reason to not trade him for anything less than a very high 2nd, or a middle 2nd and 4th if the odds are that you would get a 3rd or 4th round compensatory and you have the security of having him the entire year.

[*SHRacerX*]

(12-17-2016, 01:00 AM)Alleyviper13 Wrote: Patriots- back up brady for a few then take over

This actually makes a lot of sense to me....he's a cerebral guy, which BB would need and he is a leader.  Hmmm.  I wonder when Brady would hang them up.  

[Shake n Blake]

(12-16-2016, 06:22 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: I keep hearing people say McCarron doesn't have a strong arm but he threw some nice deep balls last season.

You don't need to have a strong arm to throw good, accurate deep passes. Dalton has a stronger arm than Mac, but Dalton doesn't throw a good deep ball due to his arm. It's all about accuracy and touch. I do believe Mac has the accuracy and touch on deep passes, but I've never seen him throw a 50 yard rope. Not saying he's Chad Pennington post injuries or 2015 Peyton, but I think it's safe to say arm strength isn't a plus for McCarron.

[Shake n Blake]

(12-17-2016, 11:40 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: This actually makes a lot of sense to me....he's a cerebral guy, which BB would need and he is a leader.  Hmmm.  I wonder when Brady would hang them up.  

It'd make sense to me if Jimmy G wasn't on their roster. Jimmy G looked superb last year. Tbh, their 3rd string rookie (name escapes me) showed promise as well.

[*SHRacerX*]

(12-17-2016, 05:52 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: It'd make sense to me if Jimmy G wasn't on their roster. Jimmy G looked superb last year. Tbh, their 3rd string rookie (name escapes me) showed promise as well.

I think his rookie deal is up, though.  And the mobile QB, that was third string, struggled later.  But I think as long as Brady seems as though he wants to play, McCarron only having one year left on his rookie deal isn't what fits them best.  

[Shake n Blake]

(12-17-2016, 06:53 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: I think his rookie deal is up, though.  And the mobile QB, that was third string, struggled later.  But I think as long as Brady seems as though he wants to play, McCarron only having one year left on his rookie deal isn't what fits them best.  

Actually, Jimmy G has a year left just like McCarron.

I'm guessing Brady plays one more year and the Pats sign Jimmy G to a long term deal. Just a guess. Either way, like you said, it just doesn't seem like the Pats are likely to pursue McCarron. If they decide to roll with a QB with 1 year left on his current deal, it's likely to be their guy.

As for the 3rd string guy (Jacoby Brissett - a 3rd round pick), yeah he struggled a bit in his 2nd start, but he was a rookie thrust into action long before planned.