Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 2.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Can The Bengals Keep This Team Together?
#81
(12-13-2022, 09:36 PM)jason Wrote: I totally forgot they were college teammates... As to your earlier post; GB was stupid for not taking Tee in the first in 2020.

Tee with Davonte wouldve won Green bay the super bowl 
Reply/Quote
#82
Dax really wasn't a 'go for it now' pick. He was a pick to cover for the future. This year I'd honestly like to see a player drafted in round one who would get more pt. You can see the balancing act going on here though and reason for it.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#83
(12-13-2022, 08:00 PM)packerbacker Wrote: We will take Higgins.

Back off cheesehead.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#84
OK, here is my best shot on the lay of the land.

My best guess is we'll have around $29 mil in cap space to sign our 6 FA's who are likely to command salaries significantly above a vet min salary (Bates, Bell, Pratt, Hurst, Apple, and Perine). That is assuming a cap of $220.5 mil. Which is what Spotrac has currently for 2023.

Now, we do not have a hard number on the cap yet. I think therexare some TV/Sponsorship/gambling details that are not final yet on the revenue side, and the Union has some decisions to make about payments that were defered during COVID that need to be paid out. If they do it all at once, the cap will be less. If they spread it out, it will be higher.

That $29 mil number has some assumptions baked in. Which we can adjust. But I will show my work.

I. We won't spend the full $29 mil.

Guys will get hurt. Their salaries will still count vs the cap. New players will have to be signed to replace them. Guys will get hurt requiring others to get waived to rebalance the roster. We will incur dead money for some guys. Other teams may release players that we want at the end, resulting in a waiver before a claim. More dead money. Usually you want $8-10 mil of wiggle room for the season. Though some teams do operate with less.

II. We don't cut anyone with a big salary.

For this team, that means starters. Only 3 Bengal reserves make more than $2 million this year. #3 OG Max Scharping makes $2.5 mil. As does injured KR/S Brandon Wilson. This year's #1 pick Dax Hill makes $2.1. Some guys are close. Perine & Flowers are at $1.8 mil. Injured TE Drew Sample $1.75 mil. DT Josh Tupou $1.4 mil. Scharping, B. Wilson, D. Sample, Flowers, & Perine are all FAs after this season. The only guys over $2 mil next year who are not currently starters are the aforementioned Hill and Carman. And with their dead cap numbers, we'd lose money by cutting either once we pay a replacement.

Also, if Perine & Apple are not considered starters, the chances we pay them significant salary is pretty low. Though Chido is coming off an injury and we have to be planning for the possibility of moving on from Mixon soon.

III. That means we have $150 mil in salary to starters baked in for next year.

Burrow, Mixon, Chase, Higgins, Boyd, Jonah, Volson, Karras, Cappa, Collins; Hendrickson, Reader, BJ Hill, Hubbard, L. Wilson, Awuzie, Hilton, and McPherson will make $150,284,623 next year. $150 mil wrapped up in 18 guys. 10 offensive starters, 7 on D, plus Mac.

IV. We won't cut any proven/talented young guys from a SB contender if we can help it, especially since their salaries are moderate & they are already signed. I have 8 players in this category, making a combined $11,473,463.

Now, everyone may fairly quibble with who is "proven" here, and maybe that is too strong a word. But I think my 8 guys in this bucket, while not having proven themselves worthy to start, have at least been competent in limited opportunities, are young guys we won't give up on yet, and/or have elevated themselves over other guys on the roster so that there are guys beneath them on the roster ladder at their positions. The 8: Adeniji (#3 OT), Ossai (#3 DE with flashes), C. Sample (#4 DE, ahead of Gunther), Tupou (#2 NT, ahead of Tufele), ADG (#3 LB), Bailey (#4 LB), CTB (#3 CB), and D. Hill (#3 safety).

Even if I'm wrong and one of these 8 get let go, it won't move the needle much/at all in terms of the cap. Other than Hill at $2.6 mil (who is going nowhere), Tupou at $1.6 mil is the high earner for 2023.

V. We bring back our other 10 players who are currently on the roster/IR who are signed for next year. These 10 make a combined $11,316,512.

Now, this won't happen. All 10 of these players (Evans, Morgan Jr , Asiasi, T. Hill, Smith, Carman, Gunter, Carter, Tufele, Anderson) will not be back. They are at the bottom of the pecking order at their positions (RB, WR, TE, C, OT, G, DE, DT, NT, S). If we upgrade, I could see any going. Though I am pretty certain Anderson stays as we traded up for him.

But the point is, aside from a round 1 pick, any replacement is likely to make about the same amount, or less, than these guys. So whether or not we keep these particular guys or not, that $11.3 mil is a solid estimate for these roster slots.

VI. That brings us to around $171 mil for 36 players. Save for Brown from the PS, who got hurt, that is all the signed players we have. So now we enter FA territory, almost.

VII. Practice squad allowance is $3.6 mil.

Acvording to Spotrac, PS players made $207k this year. I bumped it to $225k x 16 for next. There may be some dead money incurred when guys get released and new ones signed, and $225k may be too low, but it is ballpark.

VIII. Draft allowance of $1 mil.

Wait, 7 players for $1 mil? That makes no sense. Remember, it is what the draftees make compared to whom they are replacing. The #1 pick is the only guy who will likely make more than who he is replacing. CTB (Rd 2 pick) makes 17k more than Morgan Jr, for instance. Rd 3-7 almost certainly will be less. How many picks make the team and whom they bump will move the number some, but not much. As will where we pick. #27 makes just under $2.5 mil, minus whom he replaces ($1 mil) and we are starting out at +$1.5 mil. Rd 2 is a wash, Rd3 on and those guys make likely less than their replacements.

IX. We don't make a big external FA signing.

We could very well do this. But it adds another layer of complication. For now, work with me and assume we don't.

X. With 36 slots accounted for, and 6 FAs we are gonna debate, we need to allocate for 11 additional roster slots amongst our other FAs to get us to 47. I picked 11 and assumed they were all vet min types, and allocated the appropriate salary for their years of service. This added $13,220,000.

For the record, I re-signed Chrisman, Adomitis, Allen, T. Williams, Irwin, Taylor, Wilcox, Scharping, Johnston, Flowers, and Davis. If you pick diffetent guys, you could save a bit more. Of course, a couple guys on that list may be worth a bit more than vet min. But not by much.

XI. Add it all up plus our dead money already sunk ($619,060) and you get $191,513,658. Which is $29,209,776 under a cap of $220,500,000.

Bates, Bell, Pratt, Hurst, Apple, and Perine as the only significant FAs from this year. And your full compliment of draft picks. Who stays, who goes?
Reply/Quote
#85
(12-13-2022, 09:56 PM)Goalpost Wrote: Dax really wasn't a 'go for it now' pick. He was a pick to cover for the future. This year I'd honestly like to see a player drafted in round one who would get more pt. You can see the balancing act going on here though and reason for it.

Yeah it’s predicting who you may lose in a year and trying to draft their replacement. That’s when you are overall in a good place with your team. It’s a luxury and it doesn’t last forever.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#86
(12-13-2022, 09:56 PM)Goalpost Wrote: Dax really wasn't a 'go for it now' pick.  He was a pick to cover for the future.  This year I'd honestly like to see a player drafted in round one who would get more pt.  You can see the balancing act going on here though and reason for it.

The thing is, where are they gonna play? 

QB, RB, and WR are out. We picked up Jonah's option for $12 mil, he is your LT next year. We just brought in Karras, Kappa, and Collins. While none are world beaters, our OL is better. It is not a particularly deep OL class, and most of the guys who are first round worthy (3 OT) are likely gone before we pick. Some decent 2nd round types at OT & G & C, but I am not certain they beat out the guys we brought in, or Volson. 

That leaves TE. Mayer is the only Rd1 worthy guy. There is some decent depth, but are any better than Hurst? Doubtful. I wouldn't pick a TE other than Mayer in Rd1 even if we lose Hurst. Even if we re-sign him, I'd pick a TE to upgrade our depth rd2-5.

On D the starting DL is stacked. Maybe a Rd1 DT could give Hill a run for his money, but $10 mil is an expensive backup. Reader, Hendrickson, and Hubbard are absolute studs. As is Wilson at LB and Chido at one corner. Hilton is one of the best slot corners in the league. 

Hill is gonna step in for Bates and no way Lou wants to lose both safeties in the same year, so I believe re-signing the reliable Bell will be priority #1 in the off-season. 

That leaves Pratt's spot and the other corner. Pratt has been absolutely studley. If we lose him, I am not sure there is a Rd 1 worthy ILB to draft. If he stays, no way I even think LB early, ADG and Bailey have been good deputies.  We just picked CTB to play corner last year. Though you can never have too many. 

I only see Mayer (likely gone) or a corner (if they can beat out CTB) as the only pissible starters we could draft. Maybe a stud 3Tech or an ILB stud if Pratt goes. Our starters are mostly freaking studs. Or at worst, above average starters. 
Reply/Quote
#87
(12-13-2022, 11:13 PM)michaelsean Wrote: Back off cheesehead.

Only kidding bud lol.
Reply/Quote
#88
(12-13-2022, 09:36 PM)jason Wrote: I totally forgot they were college teammates... As to your earlier post; GB was stupid for not taking Tee in the first in 2020.

Yep. I’ve been saying it for 2 years. It was absolutely criminal to not give Rodgers a weapon with that pick. They had both Tee and Pittman sitting right there for the taking.

Packers have completely fallen off a cliff without Adams. And now Love is supposedly talking about demanding a trade lol. Just a totally galaxy brain pick that was.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Reply/Quote
#89
For me, my priorities would be:

1. Re-sign Bell.

Realistically, we probably have $20 mil or so with our top 6 FAs in play (Bates, Bell, Pratt, Hurst, Apple, Perine). Though it could be closer to $30 in actual space. Bates eats waay to much of that if he wants $15-$20 mil. I'd like to retain as many of the others as possible and we drafted Hill last year.

But Lou will not want to lose BOTH starting safeties. A deal with Bell gets done. He makes $7.5 mil now. I hope $8-$9 mil can get it done. If he wants $10 or more, I may want to rethink my priorities. He is not worth that much. Hoping we can work the contract to keep the cap hit down to around $6-$7 mil.

2. Pratt.

Due a raise, but how much? I do not want to go past $6-7 mil, max. In terms of cap hit.

3. Hurst. Again, $6-7 mil is my ballpark. Maybe a tad lower.

4. Perine & Apple. Both guys will be reserves, so I don't want to go too high. But both are also starter quality. If we lose one of my top 3 guys, I'd be willing to go higher on either.
Reply/Quote
#90
I see some big extensions coming for the offensive players. With the cap expected to take off from the new TV deal, I believe the team will invest in the offense and try to find defensive players in the draft to eventually replace some current starters. 

I believe the team will offer up money to Tee and it'll be similar to the Marvin Jones situation where he'll be gone if he wants to be a true #1 WR. I expect Hurst to be back. I feel like Apple was on his way out, but Chido's injury could force them to re-sign him to make sure there's no long term effects with the knee injury.
You can always trust an dishonest man to be dishonest. Honestly, it's the honest ones you have to look out for.
"Winning makes believers of us all"-Paul Brown
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)