Posts: 13,005
Threads: 353
Reputation:
43191
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
This just ends the argument that the DNC and RNC have to help people who represent other party's than there own get elected. Completely fine with that. That's how it's always been until the fake news about the DNC not helping Bernie got pushed as some sort of scandal, when the real scandal would have been them helping someone other than a Dem.
Quote:"Success doesn’t mean every single move they make is good" ~ Anonymous
"Let not the dumb have to educate" ~ jj22
Posts: 16,257
Threads: 415
Reputation:
60100
Joined: May 2015
Location: Shenandoah Valley
Mood:
Both the DNC and RNC exist to win elections, not enact public policy. Our political parties in this country are not like those in other WEIRD nations, where they are coalitions of similar minded politicos that rally around a common core of principles. Our parties are giant umbrellas that overlap each other in a significant way and have no actual structure within our government. The caucuses in Congress are more informal than most people realize and MCs aren't beholden to the party in any way other than by helping to raise money.
Honestly, I was pretty ticked off about Sanders and his situation during the last cycle. Even though from a policy view I agree with him more than Clinton, it bothered me that he was doing what he was doing to the Democratic party without being an actual member. Yeah yeah, he caucuses with the Dems in the Senate, but THE reason you are a party member is for the infrastructure for elections that they offer. You give to that infrastructure by fundraising for them, and they help with staffing, logistics, and pooling of resources. Sanders came into the primaries as a party outsider, trying to take advantage of that infrastructure.
Party over policy is just how our political parties exist in modern times. I don't like it, but that's the reality. Complaining about the parties behaving the way they have been for a century or more is inane.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
Posts: 37,609
Threads: 892
Reputation:
123486
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
I don't think it is inane to complain about how the National Committees operate. I think it would be beneficial it they were more exposed to be the self-serving entity they are.
Too many people say I'm a Republican or I'm a Democrat so I've got to vote for the candidate. It would be great if folks could see those candidates are no more viable that someone running on a smaller platform.
This past election cycle showed the worst of both National Committees and I think it was too quickly swept under the rug. The RNC did all it could to prevent a candidate from getting the nod while the DNC did all it could to ensure one person got the nod.
Posts: 16,257
Threads: 415
Reputation:
60100
Joined: May 2015
Location: Shenandoah Valley
Mood:
(06-11-2018, 12:33 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I don't think it is inane to complain about how the National Committees operate. I think it would be beneficial it they were more exposed to be the self-serving entity they are.
Too many people say I'm a Republican or I'm a Democrat so I've got to vote for the candidate. It would be great if folks could see those candidates are no more viable that someone running on a smaller platform.
This past election cycle showed the worst of both National Committees and I think it was too quickly swept under the rug. The RNC did all it could to prevent a candidate from getting the nod while the DNC did all it could to ensure one person got the nod.
The problem is that the parties are private organizations and can operate, essentially, how they please. There is no recourse that we, the citizens, have against this. They make their own rules, they are not subject to governmental oversight, and the can be as undemocratic as they please in their operation. I think the issue is that too many citizens don't know this and so assume that the parties have to have some semblance of democratic principle in their operation. Far from it.
The only way to change this would be through legislation, which isn't going to happen. It could be attacked through the route of campaign finance reform, changing the way elections are held in the states, or other ways I'm probably not thinking of off the top of my head. But the legislators aren't going to do this without the public demanding it, and the majority of the public doesn't actually understand how our political parties operate and that there are different models. If there isn't enough of a public demand, nothing will happen, and there won't be any demand because people don't know. If they don't know after over a century of this sort of thing, then I don't know how we are going to change this.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
Posts: 13,243
Threads: 431
Reputation:
39547
Joined: May 2015
Location: Birdland
Mood: None
Nothing wrong with this. It's the same as the GOP loyalty pledge. If you want to use the party's infrastructure and resources, you need to be a member.
Posts: 20,289
Threads: 98
Reputation:
187393
Joined: May 2015
Location: Bluegrass Region
Mood: None
Seems to be the norm for both of them.....time to end the duopoly of corruption.
"Better send those refunds..."
Posts: 10,718
Threads: 63
Reputation:
57608
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
Reminds me of the Pledge to America a decade or so ago. That worked out well.
Neither party is big on helping the majority of folks, but they’re both big in grandstanding.