Trump's alleged affair

[NATI BENGALS]

(01-18-2018, 10:40 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I admit I was wrong. 





I said you could prove bfine right by not replying; while you actually proved bfine right by replying. 

Now i feel much better the leader of my country was banging a pornstar shortly after his communist wife gave birth, and he paid money to cover it up and lied about it. 

On a side note. What is it you were right about? A large portion of the country voting for a self proclaimed sexual assaulter?

[*bfine32*]

(01-18-2018, 11:19 PM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: Now i feel much better the leader of my country was banging a pornstar shortly after his communist wife gave birth, and he paid money to cover it up and lied about it. 

On a side note. What is it you were right about? A large portion of the country voting for a self proclaimed sexual assaulter?

My intention is not to make you feel better; that will not happen until someone you like is in power. My intention was to point out folks trying to make a point by spouting off baseless accusations who ask to be shown that they are wrong and those that make feeble attempts to validate these accusations.   

[NATI BENGALS]

(01-18-2018, 11:52 PM)bfine32 Wrote: My intention is not to make you feel better; that will not happen until someone you like is in power. My intention was to point out folks trying to make a point by spouting off baseless accusations who ask to be shown that they are wrong and those that make feeble attempts to validate these accusations.   

Ah. Yea I wasnt really tracking the conversation. 

Just looked like folks were defending the clown who cheated on his wife right after she gave birth with a pornstar who he proceeded to compare to his daughter. 

Kinda seems like folks are selling out to defend some ass clown who meets none of their standards. It goes from party over country. To party over country, morals, values, and beliefs.

[Sociopathicsteelerfan]

(01-18-2018, 10:17 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Eh, he is fairly reflective of the larger group of Trump supporters I interact with. And by supporters, I mean those that voted for Trump because they actually saw him as the best candidate overall, not just because he was slightly less objectionable than Clinton or because he had the R next to his name.

Sorry to hear that.  Neither Lucie or GMDino is reflective of anyone I interact with in my personal life and I feel very fortunate to be able to say this.

[Vas Deferens]

Paying for sex. I know another pathetic POS that thinks that's a sign of a real man. He also imported his "wife".

Very Christian of them both.

[Belsnickel]

(01-19-2018, 01:59 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Sorry to hear that.  Neither Lucie or GMDino is reflective of anyone I interact with in my personal life and I feel very fortunate to be able to say this.

Yeah, I live in a blue city in the middle of a very red area, and I use the term city only because it is an independent city by definition. Some of the stuff I have seen and heard around here is more than a little concerning, both left and right.

[GMDino]

(01-19-2018, 01:59 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Sorry to hear that.  Neither Lucie or GMDino is reflective of anyone I interact with in my personal life and I feel very fortunate to be able to say this.

You need to interact with a wider variety of people in your personal life.

I know too many people like Lucy and you...and me.  

[Dill]

(01-19-2018, 02:54 AM)Vas Deferens Wrote: Paying for sex.  I know another pathetic POS that thinks that's a sign of a real man.  He also imported his "wife".    

Very Christian of them both.

No ordinary man can pay 130,000 for sex.  Give credit where it is due.

[GMDino]

(01-19-2018, 02:54 AM)Vas Deferens Wrote: Paying for sex.  I know another pathetic POS that thinks that's a sign of a real man.  He also imported his "wife".    

Very Christian of them both.

(01-19-2018, 04:21 PM)Dill Wrote: No ordinary man can pay 130,000 for sex.  Give credit where it is due.

Let's be fair.

Trump did not pay for sex.

He paid to keep the woman from saying they had sex.

Bad sex according to what she said before he paid her.

[*Nately120*]

(01-18-2018, 10:48 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: So, one thing of note in all of this is that the Trump supporters can easily get by with not caring about this. They blamed Hillary for Bill's stepping out on her during the campaign, so this would have to be Melania's fault using that logic. Correct me if I am wrong on this, but I recall certain posters blaming Hillary for Bill's transgressions.

But hey, we don't live in a patriarchal, misogynistic culture, right?

I was thinking more along the lines of Trump not being guilty of sexually assaulting/harassing women because they weren't as good looking as his wife.  This woman is better looking than his wife...so I guess that means he had to do it?  Ehh, it's hard to keep up with this stuff sometimes.

Who'd have thought an untouchably rich d-bag from the northeast would act more like a Kennedy and less like um...I don't know...that carpenter guy from the middle east? Anyways, this is a non-issue. Maybe Trump would be in trouble with his fanbase if he had a respectful, consensual, and/or meaningful relationship with someone of the same sex, but as long as he keeps messing around with women he should be ok.


Anywho, isn't this all a moot point? Bill Clinton being a sexual deviant just keeps neo-cons from having to go all the way back to JFK in order to justify that democrats are as a bad as Trump and neo-cons lost all right to claim to care about Christianity in government when they decided Jimmy Carter was the biggest failure ever. Carter is crap, Trump is awesome. Go Jesus! We love Christianity in action!

[Dill]

(01-19-2018, 05:44 PM)GMDino Wrote: Let's be fair.

Trump did not pay for sex.

He paid to keep the woman from saying they had sex.

Bad sex according to what she said before he paid her.

Cost of doing business.  The big players pay big.

[Dill]

(01-19-2018, 08:14 PM)Nately120 Wrote: Anywho, isn't this all a moot point?  Bill Clinton being a sexual deviant just keeps neo-cons from having to go all the way back to JFK in order to justify that democrats are as a bad as Trump and neo-cons lost all right to claim to care about Christianity in government when they decided Jimmy Carter was the biggest failure ever.  Carter is crap, Trump is awesome.  Go Jesus!  We love Christianity in action!

If you are a liberal Democrat and you don't really care if your representative bangs porn stars, then it is certainly moot.

But if you run around claiming the country is in a moral decline and Hollywood and bad role models and public tolerance of non-marital sex and divorce are primary causes of decline, then Trump's personal history is not moot.

If you call yourself a conservative Evangelical, then knowingly elect and continue to support a hound-dog gropster of a public misogynist,  then you may be asked to explain the rationale for your choice.  "Democrats are as bad" is no defense, especially when neither JFK nor Bill Clinton was the alternative to Trump.

[Belsnickel]

President Trump is accused of paying $130,000 in hush money to porn star Stormy Daniels to hide an affair a month before the election. In what is probably just a coincidence, the Trump campaign transferred $130K to the Trump businesses a month after the election. pic.twitter.com/KKknIC9ClC

— Citizens for Ethics (@CREWcrew) January 23, 2018

[Benton]

I don't care that he cheated on his wife. I didn't care that Clinton did, either.

The absurdity is from his supporters. He's a repugnant person, but people are still clinging to him being "good" because he's from their side.

[GMDino]

(01-23-2018, 02:12 PM)Benton Wrote: I don't care that he cheated on his wife. I didn't care that Clinton did, either.

The absurdity is from his supporters. He's a repugnant person, but people are still clinging to him being "good" because he's from their side.

See, I do care.

I cared about Clinton too.

In fact I said at the time he should have resigned for the good of his family, party and country.

But I agree with the rest.

[*Nately120*]

(01-23-2018, 01:52 PM)Belsnickel Wrote:

President Trump is accused of paying $130,000 in hush money to porn star Stormy Daniels to hide an affair a month before the election. In what is probably just a coincidence, the Trump campaign transferred $130K to the Trump businesses a month after the election. pic.twitter.com/KKknIC9ClC

— Citizens for Ethics (@CREWcrew) January 23, 2018

I don't understand why Mr. Genius Businessman even bothered to pay hush money since it's pretty clear this going public isn't going to change a damn thing.  Savvy business move, throwing $130k into a well like that.

(01-23-2018, 02:57 PM)GMDino Wrote: See, I do care.

I cared about Clinton too.

In fact I said at the time he should have resigned for the good of his family, party and country.

But I agree with the rest.

I'm glad Clinton and Trump are both cheaters because it gives me a fool-proof out if I'm caught cheating on my wife...well, provided she is a member of either major political party.

[CKwi88]

Wasn't it already common knowledge decades ago that Trump cheated on wife number one with wife number two? Cheating on number 3 should surprise nobody.

The guys treatment of women is probably seen as a positive among his base rather than a negative. They're probably high-fiving themselves over beating their meat to someone Trump boned.

[Johnny Cupcakes]

(01-23-2018, 03:00 PM)CKwi88 Wrote: The guys treatment of women is probably seen as a positive among his base rather than a negative. They're probably high-fiving themselves over beating their meat to someone Trump boned.

In the age of political correctness? It most certainly is. Just think back to the "grab them by the *****" comments. Some of his base were dismissing the statements as "locker room talk" and praising him for just being "one of the guys". There is no question that his treatment of women is viewed as a positive among a certain segment of his supporters.

[*Nately120*]

(01-23-2018, 03:22 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: In the age of political correctness? It most certainly is. Just think back to the "grab them by the *****" comments. Some of his base were dismissing the statements as "locker room talk" and praising him for just being "one of the guys". There is no question that his treatment of women is viewed as a positive among a certain segment of his supporters.

These are the same types of people who said most parents would be pretty flattered if Roy Moore took an interest in their teen daughter, too.  Let's just face it, as long as a rich white male is doing whatever it is, it's going to be seen as a good thing to some folks. 

[NATI BENGALS]

Highly doubt anyone with Trumps level of moral superiority would have interest in Russian hookers.