Posts: 37,544
Threads: 888
Reputation:
122787
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
..of murdering Kate Steinle
https://www.yahoo.com/news/kate-steinle-shooting-mexican-man-232500821.html?soc_trk=gcm&soc_src=ecd5e8af-dc90-3332-9efb-d522bf6b8dfa&.tsrc=notification-brknews
Quote:The undocumented immigrant accused of murdering Kate Steinle has been found not guilty of homicide, capping a closely-watched trial that magnified a contentious national debate over immigration policy.
Could this cause folks to riot?
Posts: 16,237
Threads: 415
Reputation:
60085
Joined: May 2015
Location: Shenandoah Valley
Mood:
Probably not. Sad they didn't charge with manslaughter, would have likely been a conviction.
Posts: 3,989
Threads: 44
Reputation:
27912
Joined: May 2015
Location: ¯\(°.o)/¯
Mood: None
Why would it cause a riot? Why is it surprising that a jury found a ricocheting bullet not to be intentional killing? Maybe the prosecutor should have went for manslaughter instead.
Posts: 37,544
Threads: 888
Reputation:
122787
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(11-30-2017, 10:20 PM)treee Wrote: Why would it cause a riot? Why is it surprising that a jury found a ricocheting bullet not to be intentional killing? Maybe the prosecutor should have went for manslaughter instead.
Well this was a case filled with emotion as the suspect was a felon that many thought should not have been in the country. Wonder what he was shooting at that caused the bullet to ricochet?
It is exactly as the Freddie Gray case. DA over-charged and that one caused riots if memory serves.
Posts: 37,544
Threads: 888
Reputation:
122787
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(11-30-2017, 10:18 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Probably not. Sad they didn't charge with manslaughter, would have likely been a conviction.
I will be curious to see the sentencing for felon in possession of a firearm.
Posts: 3,251
Threads: 9
Reputation:
11472
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
Not sure about riots, but I sense tweets coming soon.
Posts: 16,237
Threads: 415
Reputation:
60085
Joined: May 2015
Location: Shenandoah Valley
Mood:
(11-30-2017, 10:24 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Well this was a case filled with emotion as the suspect was a felon that many thought should not have been in the country. Wonder what he was shooting at that caused the bullet to ricochet?
It is exactly as the Freddie Gray case. DA over-charged and that one caused riots if memory serves.
The defense argued the discharge of the firearm was accidental, so he wasn't shooting at anything.
Interestingly, a federal defense attorney I follow on Twitter also brought up that voluntary manslaughter in California requires intent and since the prosecution was hinging on that intent, involuntary manslaughter wasn't likely presented to the jury as an option in the situation.
(11-30-2017, 10:25 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I will be curious to see the sentencing for felon in possession of a firearm.
It will be interesting, for sure, to see what happens. Especially since he isn't supposed to be here.
(11-30-2017, 10:36 PM)CKwi88 Wrote: Not sure about riots, but I sense tweets coming soon.
Oh, they are there.
Posts: 609
Threads: 16
Reputation:
2543
Joined: May 2015
Location: Frazeysburg
Mood: None
(11-30-2017, 10:11 PM)bfine32 Wrote: ..of murdering Kate Steinle
https://www.yahoo.com/news/kate-steinle-shooting-mexican-man-232500821.html?soc_trk=gcm&soc_src=ecd5e8af-dc90-3332-9efb-d522bf6b8dfa&.tsrc=notification-brknews
Could this cause folks to riot?
No because it was a white woman killed by an illegal. If it had been the other way around they would have had to call out the National Guard already.
Posts: 3,011
Threads: 14
Reputation:
6910
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(11-30-2017, 10:18 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Probably not. Sad they didn't charge with manslaughter, would have likely been a conviction.
It's getting ridiculous. This is at least the 3rd high-profile case I can probably think of that was overcharged resulting in no conviction.
--------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 10,718
Threads: 63
Reputation:
57608
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(12-01-2017, 01:26 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: It's getting ridiculous. This is at least the 3rd high-profile case I can probably think of that was overcharged resulting in no conviction.
There’s a variety of reasons why it happens. Attorneys looking to make a name, prosecutors expecting the other side to plead down, concerns that they’ll get a conviction only to have a judge sentence lightly. But it seems like the approach these days is too aim too high and hope for the best.
Posts: 11,154
Threads: 59
Reputation:
44245
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(12-01-2017, 01:57 AM)Benton Wrote: There’s a variety of reasons why it happens. Attorneys looking to make a name, prosecutors expecting the other side to plead down, concerns that they’ll get a conviction only to have a judge sentence lightly. But it seems like the approach these days is too aim too high and hope for the best.
Only when political reasons take precedence over the law. In high profile cases the DA themselves, an elected official, becomes personally involved in what charges are filed. They are, at their heart, political animals. One need understand nothing more to grasp the reasons behind these circumstances.
Posts: 16,237
Threads: 415
Reputation:
60085
Joined: May 2015
Location: Shenandoah Valley
Mood:
Posts: 38,853
Threads: 1,711
Reputation:
55726
Joined: May 2015
Location: SW PA
Mood:
Remarkably restrained, if still unhinged.
But he's got to blame the Democrats for the GOP not being able to pass another piece of legislation so he's busy....
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
Posts: 38,853
Threads: 1,711
Reputation:
55726
Joined: May 2015
Location: SW PA
Mood:
(12-01-2017, 10:00 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: Here is an interesting write-up on the case from Red State. https://www.redstate.com/sarah-rumpf/2017/11/30/lied-kate-steinle-case/
So sanctuary cities aren't just lawless towns where illegal immigrants can run wild?
Quote:[One quick but important note: Garcia Zarate is not going free. The jury did convict him of a lesser charge of being a felon in possession of a gun, and he now awaits sentencing, which will be 16 months, two years, or three years in state prison. He has already served two years and will get credit for that time, but even if he is not given the maximum sentence, there is an outstanding U.S. Marshals Service warrant against him, and despite the sanctuary cities policy, San Francisco apparently does turn over undocumented immigrants to the feds when they have a warrant. So he is either getting deported, or spending more time in prison first, and then getting deported.]
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
Posts: 38,853
Threads: 1,711
Reputation:
55726
Joined: May 2015
Location: SW PA
Mood:
(12-01-2017, 02:17 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Only when political reasons take precedence over the law. In high profile cases the DA themselves, an elected official, becomes personally involved in what charges are filed. They are, at their heart, political animals. One need understand nothing more to grasp the reasons behind these circumstances.
Bingo.
Quote:The prosecutors were under tremendous political pressure. People wanted Kate Steinle’s killer’s head on a platter, even before Donald Trump ever tweeted her name.
So it’s not that surprising that “San Francisco prosecutors told the jury that Garcia Zarate intentionally brought the gun to the pier that day with the intent of doing harm, aimed the gun toward Steinle and pulled the trigger,” as the Chronicle reported, adding that the Assistant District Attorney also “spent much of the trial seeking to prove the gun that killed Steinle couldn’t have fired without a firm pull of the trigger.”
This seems to be a classic example of prosecutorial overreach.They pushed hard for a first degree murder verdict, which requires not only proving that the defendant killed the victim, but that he did it intentionally, and that it was premeditated (planned or thought out beforehand).
Focusing their strategy on the lesser charge of involuntary manslaughter would have allowed the prosecutors to simply argue that Garcia Zarate acted in a criminally negligent way that resulted in Steinle’s death: he knew the object was a gun, he knew guns are dangerous, he should have known not to point it in the direction of people, etc.
Add to all of this that four-hour meandering police interrogation that allowed defense counsel to present their client as confused and intimidated by the police. Just one more little piece of the puzzle making it easier for defense counsel to portray their client as a naive fool who picked up a gun and caused a terrible accident rather than a vicious killer who stalked his victim.
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
Posts: 16,237
Threads: 415
Reputation:
60085
Joined: May 2015
Location: Shenandoah Valley
Mood:
(12-01-2017, 10:02 AM)GMDino Wrote: Remarkably restrained, if still unhinged.
But he's got to blame the Democrats for the GOP not being able to pass another piece of legislation so he's busy....
I could be wrong in this, but it would be my guess that even had the previous convictions been brought up, they would have been objected to due to relevance. Trying this case on the merits of the case alone, the prior convictions would be difficult to really bring up as none of them were violent crimes. If the crux of the case is proving intent to kill, then those don't help and could possibly result in you being in hot water with the judge.
Posts: 11,154
Threads: 59
Reputation:
44245
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(12-01-2017, 10:09 AM)GMDino Wrote: Bingo.
Odd, then, that you didn't see the exact same thing with the Freddy Gray case.
Posts: 11,306
Threads: 19
Reputation:
76738
Joined: May 2015
Location: Where Mr. Kotter was before returning
Mood: None
(11-30-2017, 10:36 PM)CKwi88 Wrote: Not sure about riots, but I sense tweets coming soon.
I've seen 3 of them. "Disgrace", "Obama's border", "Schumer and Pelosi weak on crime", and "BUILD THE WALL!"... Pretty much a greatest hits collection.
I'm gonna break every record they've got. I'm tellin' you right now. I don't know how I'm gonna do it, but it's goin' to get done.
- Ja'Marr Chase
April 2021
Posts: 10,718
Threads: 63
Reputation:
57608
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(12-01-2017, 10:36 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: I could be wrong in this, but it would be my guess that even had the previous convictions been brought up, they would have been objected to due to relevance. Trying this case on the merits of the case alone, the prior convictions would be difficult to really bring up as none of them were violent crimes. If the crux of the case is proving intent to kill, then those don't help and could possibly result in you being in hot water with the judge.
It's been about 10 years, but I covered a murder case (George Luna) where the guy was accused of murdering a woman and setting fire to her house. He fled, but a trooper pulled him over in another state, where Luna threatened to kill the guy. He was charged with threatening an officer and extradited for murder. Part of his appeal for a new trial was that the jury was tainted when prosecutors brought up him threatening the trooper (there were some other minor discrepancies, too) because it didn't relate to his history or the murder. His conviction was overturned and he was granted a new trial (which he was convicted again and given a harsher sentence).
Posts: 3,011
Threads: 14
Reputation:
6910
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(12-01-2017, 02:17 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: They are, at their heart, political animals. One need understand nothing more to grasp the reasons behind these circumstances.
I get that, and it's a complete miscarriage of justice for all parties involved.
--------------------------------------------------------
|