02-17-2016, 04:31 PM
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
Political Comics, Memes, Jokes, etc.
|
02-17-2016, 04:49 PM
02-17-2016, 04:59 PM
(02-17-2016, 12:50 AM)Vlad Wrote: We are? I'm not going to speculate what Sovereign was trying to get across to these people so i'll leave it up to him to explain. No problem. Just look up Sovereign Citizens and chattel. You'll get what I meant. I suppose I shouldn't have assumed that SN was a part of that movement though.
02-17-2016, 05:37 PM
(02-17-2016, 04:49 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: https://twitter.com/BR24/status/699849452840996864 I'm convinced that is the societally-accepted version of positing a picture of your junk online.
02-17-2016, 11:03 PM
(02-17-2016, 08:41 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: I really don't want to derail this thread, but I just don't understand the idea that deadly force is justified if there is only a threat to property. Obviously arson can cause a danger to life, but not always, and the smash and grab doesn't. I'm just not materialistic enough, I suppose. So, destruction of the community is only a mere "property offense", got it. (02-17-2016, 11:52 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Community watch groups are supposed to be for residential neighborhoods. Fred, I really don't think the meme was to be taken seriously. Originally, I only posted it to show how ignorant that people, some even in my own family, can be. However, I do tend to think that if when I was a youth, that if an angry mob of us broke out and started looting and burning the town; We likely would have been met with an equally angry mob of armed men in my current age group, demanding that we stand down and clean up that mess... Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations -Frank Booth 1/9/23
02-17-2016, 11:04 PM
..
Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations -Frank Booth 1/9/23
02-17-2016, 11:31 PM
..
Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations -Frank Booth 1/9/23
02-18-2016, 12:00 AM
02-18-2016, 01:07 AM
..
Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations -Frank Booth 1/9/23
02-18-2016, 01:20 AM
(02-18-2016, 12:00 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: If it is only theft or destruction of property, then yes. It is only a property offense. By definition. And I don't see justification in the use of deadly force in response. If someone comes in and steals all my stuff and burns my house down and I witness it chances are I would attempt to inflict serious bodily injury and maybe even kill them. We are animals. Take my food and shelter and you took my means of survival. Go after any mammal and destroy their home and take their food. You will get fight or flight. Little different scenario than looting a CVS. But still property destruction. You are going to get a reaction that ends when the threat appears over. If China starts shooting down all of our satallites. It is only property destruction. Would you ok deadly force there?
02-18-2016, 01:51 AM
(02-18-2016, 01:20 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: If someone comes in and steals all my stuff and burns my house down and I witness it chances are I would attempt to inflict serious bodily injury and maybe even kill them. 1992.....Real Americans...
02-18-2016, 08:46 AM
(02-18-2016, 01:20 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: If someone comes in and steals all my stuff and burns my house down and I witness it chances are I would attempt to inflict serious bodily injury and maybe even kill them. I don't see an issue with physical attempts to end a threat to property. Deadly force, however, is not necessary unless there is a threat to your life. That is what I am talking about. As for the China scenario, no. I'd be taking retaliatory actions of a similar nature and using defensive capabilities to put a stop to it. War would likely come because that action would precipitate things, but that wouldn't be my first instinct. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|