![]() |
Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive) +---- Thread: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. (/Thread-Salon-com-once-again-promoting-pedos) |
Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - StLucieBengal - 05-22-2016 http://www.salon.com/2016/05/17/im_not_a_monster_a_pedophile_on_attraction_love_and_a_life_of_loneliness/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=socialflow Trying to tell us all that these people aren't the absolute scum of the earth. This is exactly what we get when start believing that mentally challenged people are the opposite sex. Now we get the pedos trying to legitimize their "disease" by telling us they are just made that way..... Quote: Todd Nickerson began to suspect he was attracted to young girls when he was 13-years-old. At 18 he regularly babysat a five-year-old girl and eventually “fell in love” with her. Because he was molested at age seven, he knew the damage abuse caused and did not want to hurt the little girl. He packed up and left town so that he did not offend. RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - StLucieBengal - 05-22-2016 http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/05/18/salons-todd-nickerson-on-pedophilia-im-not-a-monster/ Quote: RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - BigPapaKain - 05-22-2016 Pedophiles need to be burned down. But comparing them to anyone else is ridiculous. But seeing the source... RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - BmorePat87 - 05-22-2016 (05-22-2016, 09:12 PM)BigPapaKain Wrote: Pedophiles need to be burned down. Let me guess, he compared pedos to trans people? RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - BigPapaKain - 05-22-2016 (05-22-2016, 09:23 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Let me guess, he compared pedos to trans people? Anyone he's claimed had a mental illness because apparently preying on the young and defenseless is the same as consenting sex between adults of the game gender or a crisis of identity. RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - BmorePat87 - 05-22-2016 (05-22-2016, 10:06 PM)BigPapaKain Wrote: Anyone he's claimed had a mental illness because apparently preying on the young and defenseless is the same as consenting sex between adults of the game gender or a crisis of identity. lol, yea, not regrading my use of the ignore list. Crap like this just brings down the boards. RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - Vas Deferens - 05-22-2016 (05-22-2016, 10:12 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: lol, yea, not regrading my use of the ignore list. Crap like this just brings down the boards. You don't like baseless empty statements without substance? If not, you're using that feature correctly. RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - Belsnickel - 05-23-2016 So pedophilia is, of course, something that occurs in the brain chemistry. Everything about who we are is a result of brain chemistry. Our sexuality, our gender identity, our food preferences, everything. It is a result of how certain chemicals fit into certain receptors and what triggers those things to occur in our brains. None of it is something we can help. The complexity of how this all happens is astounding and is something that I doubt we will ever fully understand. But, this is what all of this has in common. Being trans occurs as a result of this, just like being cis does. Being heterosexual, homosexual, a pedophile, whatever is all a result of this brain chemistry. Now, all of that was to say that this seems like someone that recognizes his issue, that his brain chemistry occurs in such a way that is not just socially unacceptable, but illegal. He knows that there is a moral line there that is not to be crossed because children cannot consent. Because acting on that brain chemistry is sexual assault. As a result of this he has attempted to form a community of people like him, that have the same issues with their brain chemistry but don't have the lack of self-control, that have the knowledge and understanding that they cannot act on this. They are doing this because them being pedophiles is not something they can help, but they can help how they act on that. They are saying that maybe we shouldn't be lumping them in with the sexual predators that act on this. I see no issue with that. I especially see no issue with it because these pedophiles are the ones that we would never know about otherwise. Because we stigmatize it in such a way they have always been afraid to come out and say "look, my brain is wired for this, but I know it's wrong and so I keep that inside." Because they haven't, we don't know who they are. And what happens when one of them does act on that urge? No one knew. They were babysitting your kid and you had no idea. If we are accepting of them in a way that they feel comfortable knowing they will not be ostracized we can still know who they are and with that knowledge we can better protect our children. Does that make any sense? I kind of rambled a bit there. TL;DR: By making them feel more comfortable letting us know their proclivities we can better keep an eye on pedophiles we would have otherwise never known about. RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - Rotobeast - 05-23-2016 (05-23-2016, 11:03 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: So pedophilia is, of course, something that occurs in the brain chemistry. Everything about who we are is a result of brain chemistry. Our sexuality, our gender identity, our food preferences, everything. It is a result of how certain chemicals fit into certain receptors and what triggers those things to occur in our brains. None of it is something we can help. The complexity of how this all happens is astounding and is something that I doubt we will ever fully understand. But, this is what all of this has in common. Being trans occurs as a result of this, just like being cis does. Being heterosexual, homosexual, a pedophile, whatever is all a result of this brain chemistry. I'm sorry, but I disagree. I understand what you are saying, but your scenario is strictly Utopian. There is no way people calmly accept their admission and monitor peacefully. II further disagree as I believe "making them comfortable" is the first step in the normalization of pedophilia and will lead down the SJW path of forced acceptance. I also believe that were they to feel comfortable, they would be more likely to act out on it. While I do think it ruthless, I believe the fear of immediate death (at the hands of the public) is necessary in this case to prevent the action. In a perfect world, I'd be more inclined towards you plan. RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - Benton - 05-23-2016 (05-23-2016, 11:03 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: TL;DR: By making them feel more comfortable letting us know their proclivities we can better keep an eye on pedophiles we would have otherwise never known about. So, we should put a giant red 'P' on their clothing to help everyone identify them? ![]() Seriously though, I dunno. I realize someone can have a problem and never act on it. You might be living next to somebody worse than Jeffrey Dahmer in the head, but you're safe and sound because he never takes that step. But we can't know if he ever will. That's not to say I think we should lock up every pedophile who admits they're attracted to kids. If we locked up everyone who thought about killing someone, every married man and woman would be a convict. But I do think we should make counseling and other tools available to help prevent them from harming anyone. RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - Belsnickel - 05-23-2016 (05-23-2016, 11:39 AM)Benton Wrote: So, we should put a giant red 'P' on their clothing to help everyone identify them? And I agree here. But many will never get that sort of help because they will be too afraid of being ostracized for doing nothing wrong if they come out about their pedophilia. RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - Griever - 05-23-2016 (05-23-2016, 11:54 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: And I agree here. But many will never get that sort of help because they will be too afraid of being ostracized for doing nothing wrong if they come out about their pedophilia. would it be considered pedophilia if they have the thoughts, but don't act on them? or would that just fall in line as a sexual fantasy RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - Belsnickel - 05-23-2016 (05-23-2016, 12:06 PM)Griever Wrote: would it be considered pedophilia if they have the thoughts, but don't act on them? or would that just fall in line as a sexual fantasy It's still pedophilia if they never act on it. RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - Rotobeast - 05-23-2016 (05-23-2016, 11:54 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: And I agree here. But many will never get that sort of help because they will be too afraid of being ostracized for doing nothing wrong if they come out about their pedophilia. That's just the thing....they will be ostracized, no matter what. When they are ostracized, they may turn to the mindset that if they are being punished, they might as well go through with the crime. Even as a parent, I believe it is in everyone's best interests for them to only "come out" to a therapist. I couldn't even tell you how I would react, if I knew one were in my neighborhood. Although I can more than guess it would be less than neighborly. I will say though, I would be ok with some of my tax dollars going towards their treatment, providing they register into a national database. RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - PhilHos - 05-23-2016 (05-23-2016, 12:09 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: It's still pedophilia if they never act on it. Correct. Pedophilia is just the romantic feelings or desire one has towards children. It's like heterophilia (romantic feelings towards a member of the opposite sex) in the sense that when I was a teenager, I had heterophilic feelings towards a few women, yet I was a virgin until I was 20. RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - Rotobeast - 05-23-2016 (05-23-2016, 12:46 PM)PhilHos Wrote: I was a virgin until I was 20. You, Dino, and Matt really make me feel like a manwhore. ![]() RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - Belsnickel - 05-23-2016 (05-23-2016, 12:46 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Correct. Pedophilia is just the romantic feelings or desire one has towards children. It's like heterophilia (romantic feelings towards a member of the opposite sex) in the sense that when I was a teenager, I had heterophilic feelings towards a few women, yet I was a virgin until I was 20. Yup, same here. (05-23-2016, 12:59 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: You, Dino, and Matt really make me feel like a manwhore. If the shoe fits. ![]() RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - Griever - 05-23-2016 (05-23-2016, 12:59 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: You, Dino, and Matt really make me feel like a manwhore. add me to the list to make you feel like more of one, lol RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - Rotobeast - 05-23-2016 (05-23-2016, 01:00 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Yup, same here. (05-23-2016, 01:02 PM)Griever Wrote: add me to the list to make you feel like more of one, lol Well...I guess I'll wear that bad mamma-jamma and stomp it down the runway. *I'm too sexy for my (other) shoe, to sexy for my (other) shoe, so sexy it hurts* RE: Salon.com once again promoting pedos. - Belsnickel - 05-23-2016 (05-23-2016, 01:16 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: Well...I guess I'll wear that bad mamma-jamma and stomp it down the runway. I always look at it as it takes all types. I think people with open relationships or those that handle things more casually or whatever, more power to them. As long as everyone is okay with the situation and understands how things are going down then it's all groovy. I also know it ain't for me. Well, with the exception of one woman where it was uncharacteristically unattached sex for me. |