![]() |
keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive) +---- Thread: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel (/Thread-keystone-pipeline-doesnt-have-to-use-american-steel) |
RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - BengalHawk62 - 03-08-2017 Thank God! I don't want any of that rusted out shitsburgh steel anywhere near my pipe. RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - GMDino - 06-18-2017 I don't want to start another thread about the pipeline. http://standwithstandingrock.net/victory-standing-rock-sioux-tribe-court-finds-approval-dakota-access-pipeline-violated-law/ Quote:Tribe, Court Finds That Approval of Dakota Access Pipeline Violated the Law RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - Dill - 06-19-2017 (06-18-2017, 08:47 PM)GMDino Wrote: I don't want to start another thread about the pipeline. This is a job killer. The pipeline would create 15,000 jobs in the first year of construction and 50,000 more to clean up spills over the next ten years. RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - GMDino - 06-19-2017 (06-19-2017, 02:23 PM)Dill Wrote: This is a job killer. The pipeline would create 15,000 jobs in the first year of construction and 50,000 more to clean up spills over the next ten years. ![]() RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - GMDino - 07-29-2017 Quote:Developer might not build Keystone XL pipeline?subject=TheHill.com%3A%20Developer%20might%20not%20build%20Keystone%20XL%20pipeline&body=From%20TheHill.com%3A%20%0A%0A%0A%0Ahttp%3A//thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/344383-developer-might-not-build-keystone-xl-pipeline http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/344383-developer-might-not-build-keystone-xl-pipeline RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - CageTheBengal - 07-29-2017 Captain Planet saves the day again! ![]() RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - Vlad - 07-29-2017 (03-03-2017, 02:16 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: He sure does lie through his teeth. Please, because a promise was made and the attempt to fulfill that promise failed does not mean "he lied through his teeth". You're smarter than that. I'll tell you what a lie is. Its when Obama promised if elected he would make his administration the most transparent ever then turned around and did the exact opposite. You want more? A lie is when Obama said he believed marriage should be between a man and a woman, then does a 180 after he was elected. RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - Vlad - 07-29-2017 (06-18-2017, 08:47 PM)GMDino Wrote: I don't want to start another thread about the pipeline. What a surprise. An Obama appointed liberal judge. His decision based on the violation of a law? “the Court agrees that [the Corps] did not adequately consider the impacts of an oil spill on fishing rights, hunting rights, or environmental justice, or the degree to which the pipeline’s effects are likely to be highly controversial" So what is the law that was violated? "Environmental justice"? LMAO This clown is as lame as the other Obama appointee in Hawaii who decided against Trumps travel ban for fear it will offend the feelings of Muslims. RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - NATI BENGALS - 07-29-2017 (07-29-2017, 01:51 PM)Vlad Wrote: What a surprise. An Obama appointed liberal judge. Lol stupid environment. Should get a lawyer and some money if it wants to be protected. We all know oil companies have every right to endanger any environment they want. RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - Belsnickel - 07-29-2017 (07-29-2017, 01:51 PM)Vlad Wrote: What a surprise. An Obama appointed liberal judge. Projects of this nature cannot proceed without an adequate study done of their environmental impact. Hell, smaller scale projects that don't involve transportation of a material that would pollute the land and water if it were to spill out require such studies. That would likely be the law to which he was referring, that there needs to be a thorough environmental impact study done. RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - Nately120 - 07-30-2017 (07-29-2017, 01:40 PM)Vlad Wrote: Please, because a promise was made and the attempt to fulfill that promise failed does not mean "he lied through his teeth". So what you are saying is that we've elected two gigantic liars back to back to run this country? Ouch, we deserve this. But seriously, I often hear people wishing politicians weren't such liars but their voting record speaks louder than these empty wishes, doesn't it? RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - TheLeonardLeap - 07-30-2017 (07-30-2017, 04:44 PM)Nately120 Wrote: So what you are saying is that we've elected two gigantic liars back to back to run this country? Ouch, we deserve this. But seriously, I often hear people wishing politicians weren't such liars but their voting record speaks louder than these empty wishes, doesn't it? I think it's more a case of... Republican Primaries: Liar Repub A vs Liar Repub B Democratic Primaries: Liar Dem A vs Liar Dem B Election: Liar Repub Winner vs Liar Dem Winner - - - - - -- - - - - - - The candidates who don't lie likely don't have the financial backing and supporters (hence the lack of need for lying) to ever become a legitimate candidate. Money doesn't win the election, but it sure as hell gets you down to the final 2 choices. We won't have honest candidates with a legitimate chance at winning until we completely overhaul our campaign fundraising/finance/Super PAC laws, and our lobbying laws... and since the people who CAN change those laws are making millions and tens of millions of dollars, while staying in power, off of how it currently is... good luck. RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - Benton - 07-31-2017 (07-29-2017, 01:51 PM)Vlad Wrote: What a surprise. An Obama appointed liberal judge. Boasberg ordered Clinton's emails to be turned over and against the IRS, leading to him being carried through the streets by Republicans chanting "Boasberg is the bestberg!". There was a reason he was approved 96-0. RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - Benton - 07-31-2017 (07-29-2017, 06:36 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Projects of this nature cannot proceed without an adequate study done of their environmental impact. Hell, smaller scale projects that don't involve transportation of a material that would pollute the land and water if it were to spill out require such studies. That would likely be the law to which he was referring, that there needs to be a thorough environmental impact study done. Which takes years in some cases. I helped with getting a children's art center built in my home town. It took about 10 months for the environmental stuff, which I thought was silly since it was on a lot where a grocery store used to be. Then during dirt work they found a few skeletons and it held up the process another year while it was determined who they were, where they should be relocated, etc. RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - Vlad - 07-31-2017 (07-30-2017, 04:44 PM)Nately120 Wrote: So what you are saying is that we've elected two gigantic liars back to back to run this country? Ouch, we deserve this. But seriously, I often hear people wishing politicians weren't such liars but their voting record speaks louder than these empty wishes, doesn't it? No. We elected one gigantic liar. Twice. After promising something but not succeeding after an honest attempt is not lying. Promising to do something then ignoring or refusing taking action on that promise would be lying. Baffling that this has to be explained. You don't hate Trump because you think he's a liar, you the hate him so you call him a liar. ![]() RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - GMDino - 07-31-2017 (07-31-2017, 11:28 AM)Vlad Wrote: No. We elected one gigantic liar. Twice. I've asked a lot a people, even tweeted the POTUS, what part of his plan that was going to cost less and provided better coverage made it into the bills being discussed? He said he had a plan. What was/is it? What part of his plan to shut down ISIS in the first 30 days has been implemented? Pick any other campaign promise made...what has HE implemented? As to the comic: Which parts were attempted and blocked by a GOP controlled congress that has shown itself unable to to pass things of their own? RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - Belsnickel - 07-31-2017 (07-31-2017, 11:28 AM)Vlad Wrote: No. We elected one gigantic liar. Twice. Now, I know what the response will be to my posting this, but here goes: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html Obama had some lies, Bush had lies, Clinton had lies, every elected official has lies. The funny part about the comic is that some of those aren't accurate, and maybe not the entire list from the NYT is, but to deny that Trump is a liar is naivete of the highest degree. RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - Vlad - 07-31-2017 (07-31-2017, 01:02 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Now, I know what the response will be to my posting this, but here goes: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html Actually, I anticipated the response I would get and yours was the one.... flip flops and petty barroom talk from a non-politician. Obamas lies shaped policy and affected lives. And why no NYT article entitled "OBAMA LIES!" I'm sure you can finally agree that the MSM is liberal biased right? Regardless, my initial point was not debate who's the biggest liar (even though it was Obama), it was to point out liberal hatred...these simpleton knee jerk "Trump is a liar" remarks only because of some agenda that he was unsuccessful at implementing. Have fun with 4 pages of this: http://www.politifact.com/personalities/barack-obama/statements/byruling/false/?page=1 RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - Belsnickel - 07-31-2017 (07-31-2017, 03:27 PM)Vlad Wrote: Actually, I anticipated the response I would get and yours was the one.... flip flops and petty barroom talk from a non-politician. Obamas lies shaped policy and affected lives. And so did many of Trump's. Denying it is naive. And Trump became a politician the moment he announced his candidacy. He was a political insider before that because of his contributions to candidates and parties. Stop trying to make him out to be a populist outsider because he is anything but. (07-31-2017, 03:27 PM)Vlad Wrote: And why no NYT article entitled "OBAMA LIES!" I don't know, ask them. Maybe because he wasn't as frequent a liar. (07-31-2017, 03:27 PM)Vlad Wrote: I'm sure you can finally agree that the MSM is liberal biased right? I would say that the editorial board of the NYT is liberally biased. (07-31-2017, 03:27 PM)Vlad Wrote: Regardless, my initial point was not debate who's the biggest liar (even though it was Obama), it was to point out liberal hatred...these simpleton knee jerk "Trump is a liar" remarks only because of some agenda that he was unsuccessful at implementing. Trump is called a liar because he is. Flat out. (07-31-2017, 03:27 PM)Vlad Wrote: Have fun with 4 pages of this: You should compare scorecard to scorecard. I look at Politicfact a good bit, so I'm familiar enough with it to know what is available on it. But let's compare. http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/ http://www.politifact.com/personalities/barack-obama/ Combination of False and Pants on Fire percentages: Trump: 48% Obama: 14% I don't know if you want to try using Politifact to back up your claim that Obama was the bigger liar. RE: keystone pipeline doesnt have to use american steel - Benton - 07-31-2017 (07-31-2017, 03:47 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: The "true/mostly true" is — to me — even more telling. Trump is only true/mostly true 17% of the time. 83% of the time, he's — according to them — telling you something at least less than half true. That's almost unbelievable. |