+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-JUNGLE-NOISE)
+--- Thread: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... (/Thread-To-Eifert-or-Not-to-Eifert-in-the-Offseason-that-is-the-question)
To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - THE PISTONS - 09-22-2017
Make your case for retaining or letting Eifert go here.
RE: To Eifert or No Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - THE PISTONS - 09-22-2017
I'll start. I think he's a talent when healthy and when playing, but he averages like 11 games played a year. I think I'd look at keeping him short-term but draft a replacement that could step in within a season or two.
Also, injuries tend to erode talent in the NFL...especially at TE. Look at guys who have a couple good years at TE like Cameron with the Browns, then they get hurt and all the sudden they are a shell of their former talented self.
RE: To Eifert or No Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - StoneTheCrow - 09-22-2017
This is an easy one. Peace dude.
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - Millhouse - 09-22-2017
Keep him if possible, but getting a quality starter tight end should be a priority over all else (in regards to the tight end position).
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - bengalfan74 - 09-22-2017
I struggle a lot with this one. On the one hand he's a top level talent when on the field. On the other hand he can't stay on the field for any length of time.
Unless he has a drastic turn around and plays every game the rest of the season and is playing in that elite class. I'd have a hard time resigning him. And even then I'd struggle signing him long term.
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - Benton - 09-22-2017
I don't think it will matter much.
The team will have a dollar amount on him based on performance. He will either take it or he won't. Either way, I don't think it will matter much. Our first two picks — depending on who is on the board — are going to be some combination of OT, TE or CB.
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - CageTheBengal - 09-22-2017
Keep him if he wants value reflective of how often he is available but don't go into the season acting like he is a guy you can depend on when you are planning for the season ahead.
Get another quality TE similar to the way New England did with Gronk and Bennett and play 2 TE sets when both our healthy and when Eifert is hurt we are going about our business with the other guy.
If we want Eifert to be our #1 point blank with your average run of the mill backups then it is a hands down hell no. We will just be setting ourselves up for disappointment.
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - jj22 - 09-22-2017
Eifert's career is in jeopardy. Him re-signing isn't even a question at this point.
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - THE PISTONS - 09-22-2017
(09-22-2017, 01:10 PM)Millhouse Wrote: Keep him if possible, but getting a quality starter tight end should be a priority over all else (in regards to the tight end position).
So knowing what you know now...would you have drafted Howard instead of Ross?
My argument against Howard is spending 3 1st Round picks on TE's in an 8-9 year span is crazy.
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - THE PISTONS - 09-22-2017
(09-22-2017, 01:14 PM)bengalfan74 Wrote: I struggle a lot with this one. On the one hand he's a top level talent when on the field. On the other hand he can't stay on the field for any length of time.
Unless he has a drastic turn around and plays every game the rest of the season and is playing in that elite class. I'd have a hard time resigning him. And even then I'd struggle signing him long term.
Well I wonder at what point the injuries will erode his play when he is on the field too.
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - ochocincos - 09-22-2017
Unless he can be retained for $4 mill a year, pass. The Bengals have too many other mouths to feed as it is. They don't need Eifert.
Invest that money into OL. Maybe draft a TE in rounds 2-3 if the Bengals are that concerned about what they have or don't like the other TEs in the upcoming FA market.
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - Millhouse - 09-22-2017
(09-22-2017, 01:26 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: So knowing what you know now...would you have drafted Howard instead of Ross?
My argument against Howard is spending 3 1st Round picks on TE's in an 8-9 year span is crazy.
Yes.
But knowing what I know now, I would have tried everything possible to trade that #9 pick for a later pick in the round, while hoping to get another late 1st round pick to go with it or a very high 2nd round pick. That would have been 2 picks before Mixon, and could have been a tackle and center.
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - Bengal Dude - 09-22-2017
Unless something drastic happens, I expect Eifert to be tagged this offseason. The Bengals will offer him a deal where they factor in his injury history. He signs the tag, we draft a TE in the 2nd-4th and have him waiting in the wings if/when Eifert walks the following offseason.
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - thillan - 09-22-2017
(09-22-2017, 01:32 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Unless he can be retained for $4 mill a year, pass. The Bengals have too many other mouths to feed as it is. They don't need Eifert.
Invest that money into OL. Maybe draft a TE in rounds 2-3 if the Bengals are that concerned about what they have or don't like the other TEs in the upcoming FA market.
Agree with this here. If he doesn't sign for a lower amount, then move on. OL needs to be #1 priority right now.
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - Pat5775 - 09-22-2017
Honestly... I think Eifert retires after next season. He'll get paid elsewhere, suffer another injury, and finally pack it in.
Gotta let him walk, sadly. It's too bad... Such great talent wasted and it's really not even his fault
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - reuben.ahmed - 09-22-2017
Missed 27 out of last 50 games, goodbye.
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - grampahol - 09-22-2017
I'm not sure the guy really even wants to play anymore. Sure, the pay is nice as is the adoration by fans and media when he's on the field producing, it's been awhile now since that stellar 15 season so I'm not completely convinced he's much into the game.
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - 2MinutesHate - 09-22-2017
I wouldn't waste a roster spot on him if I was them. Gary Barnidge had a far better season then Eifert ever did, but for some reason we think we have our own version of Gronk here.
He's just another bust. Let's move on and get better.
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - Atomic Orange - 09-22-2017
(09-22-2017, 09:29 PM)grampahol Wrote: I'm not sure the guy really even wants to play anymore. Sure, the pay is nice as is the adoration by fans and media when he's on the field producing, it's been awhile now since that stellar 15 season so I'm not completely convinced he's much into the game.
I feel the same but i do think the injuries have played a big part in his mental state.
As a fan i'm ready to move on as well.
Like i said in another thread toss him on the pile of "what ifs".
RE: To Eifert or Not to Eifert in the Offseason...that is the question... - Big Boss - 09-23-2017
I'd put some feelers out and see if any teams would be interested in a trade. Otherwise, let him walk. All the talent in the world doesn't mean much if you can't stay on the field.