(08-22-2017, 05:22 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Oops. Someone's username turned purple.

(08-22-2017, 06:38 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: You know, the best way to combat that?  Don't respond.

Yep, just don't type any response.  After a few page refreshings, it will have passed on to page 2...

(08-22-2017, 06:58 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: To save time, just go ahead and name the 10%.  Thanks.

(08-23-2017, 10:36 AM)Benton Wrote: Steelers fans, Colts fans, Browns fans (although those are about as rare as fire breathing unicorns), Ravens fans. Then there's 49ers fans, 'o woe to them.

:andy:

(08-23-2017, 10:36 AM)Benton Wrote: Steelers fans, Colts fans, Browns fans (although those are about as rare as fire breathing unicorns), Ravens fans. Then there's 49ers fans, 'o woe to them.

:andy:

(08-23-2017, 11:07 AM)BengalHawk62 Wrote: Those effing 49er fans.  Eff them and their motha's!

Off with their heads I say!

(08-24-2017, 11:03 AM)Benton Wrote: I get the Steelers hate, but I don't see how a Bengal fan can dislike any team more than the 49ers. 

(08-24-2017, 11:20 AM)Bengalzona Wrote: Up until the playoff game two seasons ago, I might have agreed with you.

(08-24-2017, 11:03 AM)Benton Wrote: I get the Steelers hate, but I don't see how a Bengal fan can dislike any team more than the 49ers. 

(08-24-2017, 11:28 AM)Millhouse Wrote: I never hated the 49rs, at least back then. They beat us twice in the Super Bowl, but to me it would be like losing to the Bulls and Jordan. We lost to the best team, with the best head coach (one of the best ever), and one of the top QBs ever to play in Super Bowls right behind Brady. I dont know, I just never felt that angst towards them just because we lost to them.

ps. I didnt start this off-topic topic for the record.

(08-24-2017, 11:24 AM)GMDino Wrote: So you hate the Bengals more than the 49ers now?  

(08-22-2017, 06:11 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I held my tongue on this, but I am glad someone said it. We don't need this sub forum to spam/dumping ground for every deadline from the Daily Wire. Not because I disagree with their general political view or because their credibility is suspect, but because we don't need every single headline here.

(08-22-2017, 06:38 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: You know, the best way to combat that?  Don't respond.

Yep, just don't type any response.  After a few page refreshings, it will have passed on to page 2...

(08-22-2017, 09:29 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Half of them don't get a response

(08-26-2017, 07:47 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: My threads get the most page views and replies on this board.

You may or may not agree with the initial post or necessarily topic but without a doubt they drive conversation and debate on this board.

Once again I am not the only person allowed to drive content on this board. There are plenty of threads that I do not respond or post into because they do not interest me or I see others are already In there responding as I would.

(08-26-2017, 10:32 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Half of the content of those threads are deliberate misinformation or blatant lies. The other half is information correcting the deliberate misinformation and blatant lies.

(08-24-2017, 11:45 AM)Benton Wrote: I dunno. I think we were far and away the better team in XVI, we just got outplayed. 

(08-28-2017, 10:23 AM)Vlad Wrote: Then you weren't the better team.

(09-12-2017, 07:22 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I will say I got a kick out of reading some of the hypocritical, self-serving, and down right false posts in this thread during my timeout. It was entertaining. Thanks guys,

(09-12-2017, 07:22 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I will say I got a kick out of reading some of the hypocritical, self-serving, and down right false posts in this thread during my timeout. It was entertaining. Thanks guys,