08-15-2015, 09:56 PM
Thread Rating:
Ben Carson: It was OK for me to do research on aborted fetuses
|
08-15-2015, 09:57 PM
(08-15-2015, 09:47 PM)GodHatesBengals Wrote: Which, again, means you believe that at one time, putting a woman to death for failing to scream when being raped was fine. Which you're free to believe, but don't be shocked when most people in the 21st century find your morals warped at best.Back then society deemed that the rights of the man outweighed the rights of the women. Hell, some thought they had no rights at all. I wonder how warped folks of the 6021st century will think we were for killing unborn children.
08-15-2015, 09:58 PM
08-15-2015, 09:58 PM
(08-15-2015, 09:56 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: And a commentary. Multitasking. What will the college board infer of your intelligence?
08-15-2015, 09:59 PM
08-15-2015, 10:00 PM
(08-15-2015, 09:57 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Back then society deemed that the rights of the man outweighed the rights of the women. Hell, some thought they had no rights at all. I wonder how warped folks of the 6021st century will think we were for killing unborn children. Weren't those laws given to them by god?
08-15-2015, 10:02 PM
08-15-2015, 10:02 PM
08-15-2015, 10:04 PM
(08-15-2015, 10:00 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Weren't those laws given to them by god? Perhaps as they understood them. So you're saying they had another reason besides convenience?
08-15-2015, 10:05 PM
08-15-2015, 10:07 PM
(08-15-2015, 10:02 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: That I can simultaneously make a commentary while asking a question. Duh. Or they might think that you do not know what forms a question. It takes more than just using punctuation; but you already knew that.
08-15-2015, 10:07 PM
(08-15-2015, 10:05 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Yes, they are life. So how can life "start" at conception when the cells needed are already "life"? You must have been sick during sex education class, or you're intentionally being obtuse. I'm pretty sure we're discussing HUMAN LIFE here, not living sperm or eggs. There is a difference, correct?
08-15-2015, 10:08 PM
08-15-2015, 10:09 PM
08-15-2015, 10:13 PM
(08-15-2015, 10:07 PM)jakefromstatefarm Wrote: You must have been sick during sex education class, or you're intentionally being obtuse. Life is life, Einstein. Unless you know of some way to animate the inanimate.
08-15-2015, 10:17 PM
(08-15-2015, 10:08 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: What? Of course I am not claiming the Bible is wrong. I am asserting it is not a textbook. The believer will read, develop a personal relationship, and grow in it. The non-believer will ridicule it and look for inconsistencies out of fear. There is quite a bit you could learn about the "unclean" meat. Start with Acts
08-15-2015, 10:18 PM
(08-15-2015, 10:13 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Life is life, Einstein. Unless you know of some way to animate the inanimate. So you think an individual sperm OR egg is human life. Got it.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
08-15-2015, 10:21 PM
(08-15-2015, 10:13 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Life is life, Einstein. Unless you know of some way to animate the inanimate. No, it's not. A sperm on it's own is not human life. Neither is an egg. Neither are capable of creating human life on their own. Even if this ridiculous argument were correct, can you get to the point? Do you even have one? One that makes sense? Skin cells are alive as well, I don't think that anyone is dumb enough to tie that into the abortion discussion. If this is the best you've got, you've got nothing here, but please don't let me get in the way of what you think is some kind of "gotcha" position.
08-15-2015, 10:23 PM
08-15-2015, 10:25 PM
(08-15-2015, 10:21 PM)jakefromstatefarm Wrote: No, it's not. I have already stated the point multiple times. You're too "obtuse" to understand. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 15 Guest(s)