Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The offensive heading into 2021
#36
(04-05-2021, 12:27 AM)Whatever Wrote: We've had articles posted from former NFL players that it isn't so simple to just have guys change sides and positions, though.  Everyone likes to look at the success we had playing Whit at G, but don't look at the failures of Andre Smith and Fred Johnson at G.  It's easy for us to say that we should plug Sewell in at G and it will be an improvement, but none of us has had the opportunity to work with him closely enough to make the determination as to whether he can play G or not. If he can, that's great, but people need to realize there's a big chance that he can't.

The other reality is that we need a starting X/Z WR and we only have 4 non-PS WR's on the roster.  Your chances of finding an immediate starter there are extremely thin in rounds 3+.  As much as we should try to improve our OL, this offense is completely dead in the water if Boyd or Higgins goes down.  

We are basically WR and OL in 1 and 2.  Whichever we don't get in 1, we have to get in 2.  We pretty much have to take a 2nd WR for a depth chart fill, though that can be a Day 3 pick.  It would be smart to get a T to groom due to the depth of the class relatively early, as well.  

I dunno on us being dead in the water of boyd or higgins goes down. That depends on the line.

Joe isn't Andy dalton. We don't have to have the best receivers in the league. Or running backs. Give Joe time to let plays develope and players are going to elevate.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: The offensive heading into 2021 - Benton - 04-05-2021, 12:40 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)