05-13-2022, 02:12 PM
(05-12-2022, 11:40 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: It's sincerely interesting that someone as educated as you can fail to add one to one and get two. Your first sentence does explain your position in this thread. You apparently have no problem with the "ministry of truth" because you agree with their mission.
And again you actually understand the point being made when others do not. Aside from the fact that "harassment" is subjective it is most certainly not an offense on the level of denying someone their democratic or human rights. Anyone who could label it as such has no business being in the business of deciding what the nation is told is true or false. As for making online harassment illegal, we'll that whole first amendment thing kind of gets in the way. Of course not for the EU, which has no such thing, but here in the US, where this odious woman will actually be working for the government, her position is as untenable as it is hyperbolic.
The question then becomes why would she label such behavior in such an extreme, and inappropriate fashion? Because if you label something as innocuous as calling someone a "dumb *****" and assault on their democratic and human rights you lay the groundwork for making such conduct illegal. This woman is as transparent as she is partisan.
Heck man, even I perfectly get the point and my dumb ass barley made it out of High School, let alone being "highly educated"; whatever that really means.
