05-24-2022, 02:59 PM
(05-22-2022, 03:53 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: dill: 1. Who determined there was "Russian disinformation" in the Steele Dossier, and how?
It's common knowledge to anyone who doesn't rely solely on CNN, MSNBC, and Rachel Maddow for their news. It's been slowly debunked over the past several years with the most recent shoe to drop being the arrest of Igor Danchenko in November. If you're sourcing the previous news agencies for your news, you probably don't know about him.
https://www.npr.org/2021/11/12/1055030223/the-fbi-arrests-a-key-contributor-to-efforts-trying-to-link-trump-with-russia
Two questions regarding the above:
1. The question I asked you was, "debunked" by "WHOM?" As in whose definition of "disinformation" was applied in the Steele case, by whom, when and where, to get this result?
"It's common knowledge" does not answer a question about the SOURCE of that supposedly common knowledge.
2. Are you saying that CNN, MSNBC and Rachel Maddow did not cover the Danchenko arrest?
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
