01-05-2016, 12:39 AM
(01-04-2016, 07:41 PM)BonnieBengal Wrote: What about Baltimore riots? Occupy property damage? Was that called terrorism?
(01-04-2016, 08:06 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: The intent has to be to coerce the government into changing some action/policy with the threat of violence. The Baltimore riots would not qualify.
This got me to wondering why the Feds didn't jump in and charge this one cat with terrorism ?
Granted, he got more than the mandatory minimum that would apply, but he destroyed a business and put peoples lives at risk to in fact have the federal government change their policies on investigating police brutality.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ferguson-st-louis-protester-sentenced-to-8-years-in-quiktrip-arson/
What "privilege" is at play here ?
