150 Armed Militia Members Take Over Federal Building

[*bfine32*]

(01-05-2016, 12:39 AM)Rotobeast Wrote: This got me to wondering why the Feds didn't jump in and charge this one cat with terrorism ?
Granted, he got more than the mandatory minimum that would apply, but he destroyed a business and put peoples lives at risk to in fact have the federal government change their policies on investigating police brutality.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ferguson-st-louis-protester-sentenced-to-8-years-in-quiktrip-arson/

What "privilege" is at play here ?

I just don't see that act as terrorism either. But of course I'm not as quick to throw the term around as others are. Even though this act seems to meet all the requirements of the FBI definition.