150 Armed Militia Members Take Over Federal Building

[*bfine32*]

(01-05-2016, 02:18 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Why do they need the guns if they are not threatening violence?  The civil disobedience of the civil rights movement did not require guns because they were no threatening violence.  These people in Oregon are different.  they intend to use violence if their demands are not met.

If a group of armed men took over your house and said they would not leave unless their demands are met you would not consider that an act of violence?  Seriously?

Not If the house was unoccupied and no neighbors were in harms way (Where's the violence?). As soon as I tried to return and they tried to stop me with force; then it has become violent.