01-06-2016, 01:51 AM
(01-05-2016, 09:34 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Taking property while armed with a gun is an act of violence.
If a person robs you with a gun then that is an act of violence even if he does not shoot you.
Everyone else understands this. Yet for some reason you believe them when they claim that they would not be the ones responsible for the violence if they start killing police or federal officers. You even quoted this ridiculous comment to support your position.
(01-06-2016, 01:24 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Why do folks find the need to make things up?
Who is making something up? Here is your quote
(01-05-2016, 06:00 PM)bfine32 Wrote: They did not say they would be the ones creating the violence.
BTW a threat of violence is an "act".
