150 Armed Militia Members Take Over Federal Building

[*bfine32*]

(01-06-2016, 01:29 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Sorry, I forgot how ignorant you were of the law.

If a person stands outside you house and says "I am going to kill you"  you are not allowed to kill that person in self defense unless the threat is viable.  Words alone do not rise to the level of a nthreat of violence.

But if a person with a gun stands outside your house and says he is going to kill you you are justified in killing that person  in self defense because the threat is viable.

The marching protesters were using threatening language, but they were not carrying guns, and they were not breaking the law and saying they will kill anyone who tries to stop them from breaking the law.

Talk out of one side of your mouth only: Is stating you are going to kill someone/ want someone killed an act?

Also you have no idea if anyone was carrying a gun in that protest; just you making up more stuff. But noted that you only consider it a terroist act if you are holding a gun when you make the statement

But there's the Fred we all know and love that insists on calling someone ignorant.

Nowhere have I said these folks are not guilty of a crime; nor have a stated whom LEOs would be justified in shooting. What do you guys call that: Strawsomething?

The quote kill or be killed is what a reporter said he was told over the phone. What do you guys call that: Hearsomething?