Trump-Biden Debates set

[Mike M (the other one)]

(05-21-2024, 07:33 PM)hollodero Wrote: I wasn't talking about him falsifying business records. I was talking about him calling a state secretary pressuring him to find him the votes needed to overturn the election results. 

I could also talk things like fake elector schemes, blatant lies about election fraud, argueing for total presidential immunity and then some. Why bring up the NY civil case instead? Why the sidetracking? When you could just say yes, pressuring state secretaries into finding votes is wrong. That's just what I can't fathom, how so many conservatives apparently are incapable of stating this simple and imho self-evident truth about this fundamental issue. 

I don't see the calling and telling him to find the votes a big deal, more like it was taken out of context. 

As far as the fake electors, that depends on to many variables that we don't have access to. And at the time, was it illegal? Not totally sure, but what i do know is several states have passed legislation making fake electors illegal.