Trump-Biden Debates set

[Mike M (the other one)]

(05-21-2024, 08:06 PM)hollodero Wrote: Out of context? The whole call is on tape, not just a snippet. In it, he clearly asks to "find him" the exact number of votes he needs to overturn the election, adding a "give me a break", then claimed it would be a big risk to not comply. What kind of context makes this ok?



Is this really the important question, to wonder about legal technicalities? What about whether it is morally corrupt or not? Or would you claim that sending "alternate" electors that ignore the state's election results is just fine as long as it is not distinctly determined to be illegal? A stance I would find tough to accept really; and I can not quite believe you would let this excuse fly if Biden or Hillary employed such a scheme.

And coming from a guy that was on his last straws looking for a break? or hoping there was an error somewhere? 
With the amount of ballot harvesting that goes on, it's not illogical that some votes gets missed. I have a hard time trusting the process myself, especially if it's close. 

I've pasted in the past, instances where votes were added at the last minutes and change the outcome and some people did it illegally thus the votes got dismissed and the other candidate won. This does happen, but more at the local level than Federal level. 

Legal or not matters most, but do you really expect a guy like Trump to not find a gray area and push it? I think it was a bad move, but Trump is Trump and he's a sore loser. It's his nature.