150 Armed Militia Members Take Over Federal Building

[*bfine32*]

(01-06-2016, 02:59 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Actually your defense of these criminals goes way beyond the semantics of calling them terrorists.  Just go back and look at the dozens of posts you have made that do not even mention the word terrorism.

Throughout this thread you have insisted that they have not committed any act of violence by occupying this land with open weapons and insisting that they will not be arrested.  This is clearly an act of violence.  There is no other reasonable way to look at it.  

You are not just claiming they are not terrorists.  You are insisting that they have not threatened the use of violence when it is clear to anyone else that they have.

I am stating they have not commited a violent act; you are. That has been my only "defense" (oh and not classifying them as Terrorists).

You orginally stated just saying it was an act, that has now changed to just saying, while holding a weapon, and presenting a threat.

Also you're using a reported phone conversation with a reporter as justification to say they have conveted this threat

If these folks have committed violent acts then why haven't the authorities moved in? Remember when the Boston Bomber was holed up in the boat? Why did the authorities move in? He could have been heavily armed or bombed.

Also why isn't the National Media (consevative as Benton may want folks to think they are) refering to these people as Terrorists?