RB Stable with Mixon Gone

[*bfine32*]

(05-23-2024, 01:52 AM)PDub80 Wrote: You're arguing just to argue.....

Planting your flag in CH-E?

- CH-E is a 1st round bust and the Chiefs shoved him down the depth chart after year 1.

- Ronald Jones is and was a nobody

- McKinnon, bless his soul, won me a fantasy title.... WITH RECEIVING YARDS & TDs. Not rushing, which is why you had to quote his yards from scrimmage and not rushing stats.

- Pacheco was an emerging young player and far from some proven playmaker.

^ He's a great example of why you rotate through RBs - yes, even young ones - until you find guys that fit your offense in today's NFL. None of these guys are "bell cows". They are a complimenting group.

And I STILL want to know if Chris Evans made a pass at one of the Blackburn girls or something and upset ownership. He's electric when he gets his hands on the ball.... yet has been MIA after a very good preseason.

I am not saying Moss is Emmit Smith. I'm saying he is at worse the same production as Mixon while blocking better....  AND Brown will get the rock more with Mixon gone - which makes the Bengals rushing atttack more explosive. AND that the Bengals did well in making better use of Mixons money.

 CE-H had a fine rookie season and was having a good 2nd year until he suffered a knee injury in those 2 years he rushed for well over 1300 yards, 400 receiving yards, and 11 TDs, but that's probably not as firm of ground to plant one's flag than Chase and his 179 rushing yards, 156 receiving yards, and 1 TD

Prior to being signed by KC Ro Jo had played 4 years in the NFL, He had 2174 rushing yards, 571 receiving yards, and 19 TDs

Prior to being signed by Cincy ZM has played 4 years in the NFL, He has 2076 rushing yards, 523 receiving yards and 18 TDs

Now if you classify RO Jo as a "Nobody" when KC signed him, what do you classify ZM as?

And remember I'm the one "Just arguing to argue".