150 Armed Militia Members Take Over Federal Building

[GMDino]

(01-06-2016, 09:56 PM)bfine32 Wrote: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/16/black-lives-matter-protesters-berate-white-student/


They  do not fit my definition of Terrorists because they did not commit a violent act, just blew a lot of hot air. 

Not sure how I've wavered in this or holding back on saying 'what I mean'.  It is just this and other scenarios meet the criteria that the more "open-minded" on here consider terrorism, yet they demonstrate for inconsistency for some reason. 

I could probably list 5 or more reasons that this library scenario is more in line with terrorism than the Oregon case. But why?  I do not consider either an act of terror. 

And after all of this:  Why do you care?

You say you think they are doing something illegal.  You say you don't support their actions.  So terrorist, criminal, whatever your word of choice...why do you care what anyone else calls them?