01-06-2016, 11:34 PM
(01-06-2016, 11:27 PM)bfine32 Wrote: They didn't want a peaceful resolution in Boston?
Wonder why they were willing to risk it?
Because the threats of violence in this case have been limited to law enforcement personnel while the Boston bombers were a threat to every citizen in the area.
Not that hard to understand if you just take a minute to think about it.
BTW I could list at least a dozen examples of law enforcement waiting to rush into a violent situation. there have been many famous "stand-offs" where the police tried to negotiate a peaceful resolution instead of going in guns blazing the first chance they get.
Again, pretty simple for me to see the reason, but not surprised that you don't.
